Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Nov-Dec:83:101468.
doi: 10.1016/j.appdev.2022.101468. Epub 2022 Oct 10.

Differential associations of maternal behavior to preschool boys' and girls' executive function

Affiliations

Differential associations of maternal behavior to preschool boys' and girls' executive function

Daphne M Vrantsidis et al. J Appl Dev Psychol. 2022 Nov-Dec.

Abstract

Boys are more sensitive to environmental factors like parental behavior, an important predictor of executive function. This study examined whether the interaction between child sex and maternal behavior was associated with children's executive function in a manner consistent with the vulnerability or differential susceptibility model. Participants were 146 36-month-old children and their mothers. Maternal responsiveness and negative reactivity were coded during structured mother-child interactions. Executive function was operationalized as latent self-control and working memory/inhibitory control (WMIC). Structural equation modelling supported a sex by responsiveness interaction for self-control but not WMIC. Consistent with a vulnerability model, less responsiveness was associated with poorer self-control for boys relative to girls. Boys' self-control may be more vulnerable to the negative effect of unresponsive maternal behavior helping explain boys increased risk for externalizing behavior problems.

Keywords: Early childhood; Executive Function; Parenting; Sex differences.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Competing Interest The authors have no conflicts of interest to report.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Path diagram illustrating the main and interaction effects of maternal behavior and child sex on self-control and working memory/inhibitory control (WMIC). Both unstandardized and standardized (in parentheses) parameters are presented; error variances are not shown. +p < 0.10; *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Relation between responsive maternal behavior and self-control by child sex. The region of significance indicates the value of responsiveness (12.57, 0.20 standard deviations below the mean) below which boys’ and girls’ self-control significantly differs.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Allan NP, & Lonigan CJ (2011). Examining the dimensionality of effortful control in preschool children and its relation to academic and socioemotional indicators. Developmental Psychology, 47(4), 905–915. 10.1037/a0023748 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Amicarelli AR, Kotelnikova Y, Smith HJ, Kryski KR, & Hayden EP (2018). Parenting differentially influences the development of boys’ and girls’ inhibitory control. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 36(3), 371–383. 10.1111/bjdp.12220 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bakermans-Kranenburg MJ, & van IJzendoorn MH (2011). Differential susceptibility to rearing environment depending on dopamine-related genes: New evidence and a meta-analysis. Development and Psychopathology, 23(1), 39–52. 10.1017/S0954579410000635 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Belsky J, & Pluess M (2009). Beyond diathesis stress: Differential susceptibility to environmental influences. Psychological Bulletin, 135(6), 885–908. 10.1037/a0017376 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Belsky J, & Pluess M (2013). Beyond risk, resilience, and dysregulation: Phenotypic plasticity and human development. Development and Psychopathology, 25(4 Part 2), 1243–1261. 10.1017/S095457941300059X - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources