Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 May 23;14(1):2948.
doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-38649-5.

Wigner-molecularization-enabled dynamic nuclear polarization

Affiliations

Wigner-molecularization-enabled dynamic nuclear polarization

Wonjin Jang et al. Nat Commun. .

Abstract

Multielectron semiconductor quantum dots (QDs) provide a novel platform to study the Coulomb interaction-driven, spatially localized electron states of Wigner molecules (WMs). Although Wigner-molecularization has been confirmed by real-space imaging and coherent spectroscopy, the open system dynamics of the strongly correlated states with the environment are not yet well understood. Here, we demonstrate efficient control of spin transfer between an artificial three-electron WM and the nuclear environment in a GaAs double QD. A Landau-Zener sweep-based polarization sequence and low-lying anticrossings of spin multiplet states enabled by Wigner-molecularization are utilized. Combined with coherent control of spin states, we achieve control of magnitude, polarity, and site dependence of the nuclear field. We demonstrate that the same level of control cannot be achieved in the non-interacting regime. Thus, we confirm the spin structure of a WM, paving the way for active control of correlated electron states for application in mesoscopic environment engineering.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Wigner molecule formation in a GaAs double quantum dot.
a Scanning electron microscope image of a GaAs quantum dot (QD) device similar to the one used in the experiment. Green dots denote the double QD defined for Wigner molecule (WM) formation which is aligned along the [110] crystal axis (black arrow). The inner plunger gate V2 is designed to have anisotropic confinement potential as shown in the right panel to facilitate the localization of the electronic ground state. Yellow circle: a radio-frequency (rf) single-electron transistor (rf-SET) charge sensor for rf-reflectometry. External magnetic field B0 is applied along the direction denoted by the yellow arrow. b Charge stability diagram of the double QD near the three-electron region spanned by V1 and V2 gate voltages. Green-shaded region: the energy-selective tunneling (EST) position for the state readout and initialization. c Landau–Zener–Stückelberg (LZS) oscillation of the WM at B0 = 0 T. The relative phase evolution between the excited doublet (DT) and the ground doublet (DS) results in the oscillation captured by the EST readout. Red-dashed curve in the fast Fourier transformed (FFT) map shows energy dispersion calculated from the toy-model Hamiltonian. The calculation yields quenched orbital energy spacing of the inner dot δR ~ 0.9 h·GHz. d Left (Right) panel: Energy spectrum along the (2,1)–(1,2) charge configuration in the non-interacting (strongly interacting, this work) regime with δL ~ 100 h·GHz (δL ~ 19 h·GHz), and δR ~ 100 h·GHz (δR ~ 0.9 h·GHz). EQ (red-dashed curve) is the energy splitting between the two lowest levels.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. Leakage spectroscopy and probabilistic nuclear polarization with the Wigner molecule.
a Left panel: schematics of the energy levels for different external magnetic fields B0 > 0 T. Crossings between different ms states become anticrossings aided by the transverse nuclear Overhauser field. Right panel: schematic of the pulse sequence for leakage spectroscopy and probabilistic dynamic nuclear polarization (DNP). The pulse diabatically drives the initialized DS(2,1;1/2) [DS(2,1;−1/2)] to (1,2), and hold ε for 100 ns ≫ T2*. Upon the coincidence of the pulse detuning and the anti-crossing, the state probabilistically evolves to Q(1,2;3/2) [Q(1,2;1/2)] and flips the electron spin ΔmS = +1 which accompanies ΔmN = −1. The scale bars on the bottom axis (ε axis) denote 50 μeV, and the scale bars on the left axis (Energy axis) denote 1 h·GHz. b Leakage spectroscopy of the Wigner molecule (WM) state as a function of B0 and the pulse amplitude Ap. Black (Red) dotted curve shows the calculated energy splitting between DT (Q) and DS at B0 = 0 T. Measurement-induced nuclear field shifts the dispersion opposite to the direction of B0. c, d Leakage measurement with an additional probabilistic polarization pulse with amplitude Ap′ applied before each line sweep. The Ap′ is fixed to 370 (450) mV, and the additional distortion in the leakage spectrum is shown as red circles near a pulse amplitude of 370 (450) mV. Black arrows denote the magnetic field sweep direction.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3. Bidirectional and controllable dynamic nuclear polarization enabled by Wigner molecularization.
a Top panel: Schematic of the anticrossings used for deterministic dynamic nuclear polarization (DNP). Bottom panel: pulse sequence used for S- and T-polarizations. For tevol = 0 ns, the sequence corresponds to maximum S-polarization, which brings DS(1,2;1/2) [DS(1,2;−1/2)] adiabatically across the anti-crossing to Q(1,2;3/2) [Q(1,2;1/2)] flipping the electron spin with ΔmS = +1 and leading to ΔmN = −1 (blue arrow, S-polarization). For tevol = 600 ns, the sequence corresponds to maximum T-polarization. Herein, the DT(1,2;1/2) prepared with a (Landau–Zener–Stückelberg) LZS-oscillation-induced π-pulse is adiabatically transferred to DS(1,2;1/2), resulting in ΔmS = −1 and ΔmN = +1 (red arrow, T-polarization), which has the opposite polarization effect compared to S-polarization. b Change in the nuclear field δBnuc as a function of tevol. The gray curve shows the corresponding LZS oscillation measurement reflecting the DT population. The δBnuc oscillates out of phase to the LZS oscillation owing to the oscillation of the S- and T-polarization ratio. c The magnitude of the maximum polarization Bmax as a function of ramp time wR. The Bnuc saturates to Bmax when the polarization and the nuclear spin diffusion rate reach an equilibrium. For small wR, the |Bmax| decreases because of the small Landau–Zener transition probability PLZ for both S- (blue circle) and T-polarizations (red circle). In the case of T-polarization, |Bmax| decreases again for long wR owing to the lattice relaxation of the excited population. d Bmax as a function of δR. The polarization gets more efficient for smaller δR indicating a strong dependence of the nuclear polarization efficiency on the Wigner parameter. e, f Dynamic nuclear control with the S (T)-polarization sequence. The red dotted line is the numerical fit derived from the simple rate equation-based model. The fit yields the nuclear spin diffusion time τN ~ 62 s, with a polarization magnitude per spin flip of ~2.58 h·kHz·(g*μB)−1. g On-demand DNP via tevol. h Adiabatic ramp amplitude AR with tevol = 0 ns realizing self-limiting DNP.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4. Field gradient control and measurement.
Landau–Zener–Stückelberg (LZS) oscillation of the Wigner molecule (WM) states at B0 = 230 mT in a the time domain and b the frequency domain with the S-polarization sequence. The oscillation reveals the relative phase oscillation of the DT1DS (black arrow, black dotted arrow) and DT0DS (red arrow) of both the ms = 1/2 and ms = −1/2 states. The DT0DS splitting is constant regardless of the magnetic field gradient ΔBZ, whereas the DT1DS energy spacing is modulated by the ΔBZ depending on the sign of ΔBZ and ms. The resultant beating is visible in e, f the time (frequency) domain line-cut when the polarization is on (green arrow in a) and off (blue arrow in a). The line cuts in the time domain are numerically fitted to the sum of three sine functions (solid lines in e) with different amplitudes. Three separate peaks are visible in the frequency domain (f) when the ΔBZ is largely polarized in the bottom panel (blue line) in (f) Simulated LZS oscillation in c the time domain and d the frequency domain with the ΔBZ in the inset of (d). The simulation in the frequency domain reproduces the branches shown in (b).

References

    1. Chekhovich EA, et al. Nuclear spin effects in semiconductor quantum dots. Nat. Mater. 2013;12:494–504. doi: 10.1038/nmat3652. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Nichol JM, et al. Quenching of dynamic nuclear polarization by spin–orbit coupling in GaAs quantum dots. Nat. Commun. 2015;6:7682. doi: 10.1038/ncomms8682. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Petta JR, et al. Coherent manipulation of coupled electron spins in semiconductor quantum dots. Science. 2005;309:2180–2184. doi: 10.1126/science.1116955. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Johnson AC, et al. Triplet–singlet spin relaxation via nuclei in a double quantum dot. Nature. 2005;435:925–928. doi: 10.1038/nature03815. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Tartakovskii AI, et al. Nuclear spin switch in semiconductor quantum dots. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2007;98:026806. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.026806. - DOI - PubMed