Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 May 23;22(1):99.
doi: 10.1186/s12939-023-01914-6.

Associations between physical and mental health and the utilization of ambulatory and emergency healthcare among asylum-seekers: results from a cross-sectional survey in Berlin, Germany

Nora Gottlieb  1   2 , Martin Siegel  3
Affiliations

Associations between physical and mental health and the utilization of ambulatory and emergency healthcare among asylum-seekers: results from a cross-sectional survey in Berlin, Germany

Nora Gottlieb et al. Int J Equity Health. .

Abstract

Background: Despite a high burden of chronic and mental illness, asylum-seekers show low utilization of ambulatory specialist healthcare. Forgoing timely healthcare when facing access barriers may direct them toward emergency care. This paper examines interrelations of physical and mental health and utilization of ambulatory and emergency care, and explicitly addresses associations between the different types of care.

Methods: A structural equation model was applied to a sample of n = 136 asylum-seekers living in accommodation centers in Berlin, Germany. Utilization patterns of emergency care (outcome) and physical and mental ambulatory care (endogenous predictors) were estimated, while controlling for age, gender, chronic conditions, bodily pain, depression, anxiety, length of stay in Germany (exogenous predictors) and self-rated health (endogenous predictor).

Results: Associations were observed between ambulatory care utilization and poor self-rated health (0.207, CI: 0.05; 0.364), chronic illness (0.096, CI: 0.017; 0.175) and bodily pain (0.019, CI: 0.002; 0.036); between mental healthcare utilization and anxiety (0.202, CI: 0.051; 0.352); and between emergency care utilization and poor self-rated health (0.621, CI: 0.059; 1.183), chronic illness (0.287, CI: 0.012; 0.563), mental healthcare utilization (0.842, CI: 0.148; 1.535) and anxiety (0.790, CI: 0.141; 1.438) (values in parentheses show estimated regression coefficients and 95% confidence intervals). We found no associations between the utilization of ambulatory and emergency care.

Conclusions: Our study generates mixed results concerning associations between healthcare needs and ambulatory and emergency care utilization among asylum-seekers. We found no evidence that low utilization of ambulatory care contributes to emergency care utilization; neither did we find evidence that ambulatory treatment obviates the need to seek emergency care. Our results indicate that higher physical healthcare needs and anxiety are associated with more utilization of both ambulatory and emergency care; whereas healthcare needs related to depression tend to remain unmet. Both the undirected and under-utilization of health services may reflect navigation and accessibility issues. To facilitate more needs-based and effective healthcare utilization and thus contribute to health equity, support services such as interpretation and care navigation as well as outreach are warranted.

Keywords: Asylum-seekers; Chronic disease; Emergency care; Germany; Healthcare utilization; Mental health; Refugees; Structural equation model.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Full estimation model. The illustration shows our full estimation model, built of direct and indirect associations among physical and mental health, ambulatory physical and mental healthcare utilization, and emergency care utilization among asylum-seeking respondents
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

References

    1. Gottlieb N, Püschmann C, Stenzinger F, Koelber J, Rasch L, Koppelow M, et al. Health and healthcare utilization among asylum-seekers from Berlin’s LGBTIQ shelter: preliminary results of a survey. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(12):4514. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17124514. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wenner J, Biddle L, Gottlieb N, Bozorgmehr K. Inequalities in access to healthcare by local policy model among newly arrived refugees: evidence from populations-based studies in two German states. Int J Equity Health. 2022;21(11):1–12. doi: 10.1186/s12939-021-01607-y. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Niedermaier A, Freiberg A, Tiller D, Wienke A, Führer A. Outpatient health care utilization and health expenditures of asylum seekers in Halle (Saale), Germany - an analysis of claims data. BMC Health Serv Res. 2020;20(1):1–15. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05811-4. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bauhoff S, Göpffarth D. Asylum-seekers in Germany differ from regularly insured in their morbidity, utilizations and costs of care. PLoS ONE. 2018;13(5):e0197881. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0197881. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Biddle L, Menold N, Bentner M, Nöst S, Jahn R, Ziegler S, et al. Health monitoring among asylum seekers and refugees: A state-wide, cross-sectional, population-based study in Germany. Emerg Themes Epidemiol. 2019;16(1):1–21. doi: 10.1186/s12982-019-0085-2. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types