Response to Knight and Nelson-Piercy 'Clarity of guidelines concerning the care of pregnant women is lost by the use of de-sexed language'
- PMID: 37221821
- DOI: 10.1111/bjh.18858
Response to Knight and Nelson-Piercy 'Clarity of guidelines concerning the care of pregnant women is lost by the use of de-sexed language'
Comment on
-
Clarity of guidelines concerning the care of pregnant women is lost by the use of de-sexed language.Br J Haematol. 2023 Jul;202(2):437. doi: 10.1111/bjh.18857. Epub 2023 May 23. Br J Haematol. 2023. PMID: 37221819 No abstract available.
References
REFERENCES
-
- [cited 2023 Apr 29]. Available from: https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/pages/instructions-for-authors
-
- MacKinnon KR, Lefkowitz A, Lorello GR, Schrewe B, Soklaridis S, Kuper A. Recognizing and renaming in obstetrics: how do we take better care with language? Obstet Med. 2021;14:201-3.
-
- Gribble KD, Bewley S, Bartick MC, Mathisen R, Walker S, Gamble J, et al. Effective communication about pregnancy, birth, lactation, breastfeeding and newborn care: the importance of sexed language. Front Glob Womens Health. 2022;3:818856.
-
- Gamble J, Gribble K. Inclusive' language on maternity care risks excluding many women. 2022. The Guardian, 6 May.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
