Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2023 May;26(5):e26100.
doi: 10.1002/jia2.26100.

Factors associated with mobile app-based ordering of HIV self-test kits among men who have sex with men in Atlanta, Detroit and New York City: an exploratory secondary analysis of a randomized control trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Factors associated with mobile app-based ordering of HIV self-test kits among men who have sex with men in Atlanta, Detroit and New York City: an exploratory secondary analysis of a randomized control trial

Noah Mancuso et al. J Int AIDS Soc. 2023 May.

Abstract

Introduction: The United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention currently recommends HIV screening at least annually among sexually active gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men (MSM), but only half report being tested in the past year in the United States. As HIV self-test kits are becoming more available around the United States via web and app-based interventions, it is important to understand who is willing and able to order them. This analysis sought to better understand predictors of free HIV self-test kit utilization among MSM in M-cubed, an HIV prevention mobile app intervention trial in Atlanta, Detroit and New York City.

Methods: We conducted an exploratory secondary analysis of self-report and in-app data collected from the intervention arm of the M-Cubed study from 24 January 2018 to 31 October 2019. Behavioural, demographic and other potential predictors of HIV self-test ordering were identified from Social Cognitive Theoretical underpinnings of the app, and from the literature. Significant predictor variables in bivariate analyses were considered for inclusion in the empiric multivariable model. Demographic variables chosen a priori were then added to a final model estimating adjusted prevalence ratios (aPR).

Results: Over half of the 417 intervention participants ordered an HIV self-test kit during the study. In bivariate analyses, ordering a kit was associated with HIV testing history, plans to get tested and reported likelihood of getting tested. In the final model, participants were more likely to order a kit if they reported plans to get tested in the next 3 months (aPR = 1.58, 95% CI: 1.18-2.11) or had not tested for HIV in the past 3 months (aPR = 1.38, 95% CI: 1.13-1.70). There was no difference in HIV self-test kit ordering by income, race/ethnicity or age.

Conclusions: HIV testing is an important tool in ending the HIV epidemic and must be accessible and frequent for key populations. This study demonstrates the effectiveness of HIV self-test kits in reaching populations with suboptimal testing rates and shows that self-testing may supplement community-based and clinical testing while helping overcome some of the structural barriers that limit access to annual HIV prevention services for MSM.

Keywords: HIV; HIV testing; digital divide; men who have sex with men; mobile apps; self-testing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Authors Mancuso, Mansergh, Stephenson, Horvath, Hirshfield, Bauermeister, Chiasson, Downing and Sullivan report no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Relationship between the baseline M‐Cubed survey variables used in the analysis, mapped to their SCT domains, and the HIV prevention behaviour outcome of ordering an HIV self‐test kit.

References

    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention . HIV in the United States and dependent areas at a glance [Internet]. 2022 Mar [cited 2022 Apr 18]. Report No.: 22. https://www.cdc.gov/hiv/statistics/overview/ataglance.html
    1. US Department of Health and Human Services . What is ‘Ending the HIV Epidemic: A Plan for America’? [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2020 Nov 12]. https://www.hiv.gov/federal‐response/ending‐the‐hiv‐epidemic/overview
    1. Sullivan PS, Satcher Johnson A, Pembleton ES, Stephenson R, Justice AC, Althoff KN, et al. Epidemiology of HIV in the USA: epidemic burden, inequities, contexts, and responses. Lancet. 2021;397(10279):1095–106. - PubMed
    1. Wood BR, Young JD, Abdel‐Massih RC, McCurdy L, Vento TJ, Dhanireddy S, et al. Advancing digital health equity: a policy paper of the Infectious Diseases Society of America and the HIV Medicine Association. Clin Infect Dis. 2021;72(6):913–9. - PMC - PubMed
    1. DiNenno EA, Prejean J, Irwin K, Delaney KP, Bowles K, Martin T, et al. Recommendations for HIV screening of gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men ‐ United States, 2017. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2017;66(31):830–2. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types