Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Dec;29(8):1326-1337.
doi: 10.1111/jep.13867. Epub 2023 May 24.

Diagnostic testing in children: A qualitative study of pediatricians' considerations

Fabienne G Ropers  1 , Sophie Rietveld  1 , Edmond H H M Rings  1   2 , Patrick M M Bossuyt  3   4 , Leti van Bodegom-Vos  5 , Marij A Hillen  6
Affiliations

Diagnostic testing in children: A qualitative study of pediatricians' considerations

Fabienne G Ropers et al. J Eval Clin Pract. 2023 Dec.

Abstract

Aims and objectives: Studies in adult medicine have shown that physicians base testing decisions on the patient's clinical condition but also consider other factors, including local practice or patient expectations. In pediatrics, physicians and parents jointly decide on behalf of a (young) child. This might demand more explicit and more complex deliberations, with sometimes conflicting interests. We explored pediatricians' considerations in diagnostic test ordering and the factors that influence their deliberation.

Method: We performed in-depth, semistructured interviews with a purposively selected heterogeneous sample of 20 Dutch pediatricians. We analyzed transcribed interviews inductively using a constant comparative approach, and clustered data across interviews to derive common themes.

Results: Pediatricians perceived test-related burden in children higher compared with adults, and reported that avoiding an unjustified burden causes them to be more restrictive and deliberate in test ordering. They felt conflicted when parents desired testing or when guidelines recommended diagnostic tests pediatricians perceived as unnecessary. When parents demanded testing, they would explore parental concern, educate parents about harms and alternative explanations of symptoms, and advocate watchful waiting. Yet they reported sometimes performing tests to appease parents or to comply with guidelines, because of feared personal consequences in the case of adverse outcomes.

Conclusion: We obtained an overview of the considerations that are weighed in pediatric test decisions. The comparatively strong focus on prevention of harm motivates pediatricians to critically appraise the added value of testing and drivers of low-value testing. Pediatricians' relatively restrictive approach to testing could provide an example for other disciplines. Improved guidelines and physician and patient education could help to withstand the perceived pressure to test.

Keywords: clinical decision making; diagnostic tests; guidelines; low-value care; pediatrics.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Balogh EP. Improving diagnosis in health care. In: Balogh EP, Miller BT, Ball JR, eds. Improving Diagnosis in Health Care, 2015.
    1. Committee on Diagnostic Error in Health Care, Board on Health Care Services, Institute of Medicine, The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine. The diagnostic process. In Balogh EP, Miller BT, Ball JR, eds. National Academies Press; 2015:31-80.
    1. Kassirer JP. Our stubborn quest for diagnostic certainty. N Engl J Med. 1989;320(22):1489-1491.
    1. Pauker SG, Kassirer JP. The threshold approach to clinical decision making. N Engl J Med. 1980;302(20):1109-1117.
    1. Lee DW, Neumann PJ, Rizzo JA. Understanding the medical and nonmedical value of diagnostic testing. Value Health. 2010;13(2):310-314.

LinkOut - more resources