Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jun;34(6):1377-1383.
doi: 10.1111/jce.15935. Epub 2023 May 24.

Right atrial collision time (RACT): A novel marker of propensity for typical atrial flutter

Nick Ryckman  1   2   3 , Derek Crinion  2   3 , Andres Enriquez  2   3 , David Bakker  2   3 , Sanoj Chacko  2   3 , Hoshiar Abdollah  2   3 , Adrian Baranchuk  2   3 , Christopher Simpson  2   3 , Damian P Redfearn  2   3
Affiliations

Right atrial collision time (RACT): A novel marker of propensity for typical atrial flutter

Nick Ryckman et al. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2023 Jun.

Abstract

Introduction: The risk of typical atrial flutter (AFL) is increased proportionately to right atrial (RA) size or right atrial scarring that results in reduced conduction velocity. These characteristics result in propagation of a flutter wave by ensuring the macro re-entrant wave front does not meet its refractory tail. The time taken to traverse the circuit would take account of both of these characteristics and may provide a novel marker of propensity to develop AFL. Our goal was to investigate right atrial collision time (RACT) as a marker of existing typical AFL.

Methods: This single-centre, prospective study recruited consecutive typical AFL ablation patients that were in sinus rhythm. Controls were consecutive electrophysiology study patients >18 years of age. While pacing the coronary sinus (CS) ostium at 600 ms, a local activation time map was created to locate the latest collision point on the anterolateral right atrial wall. This RACT is a measure of conduction velocity and distance from CS to a collision point on the lateral right atrial wall.

Results: Ninety-eight patients were included in the analysis, 41 with atrial flutter and 57 controls. Patients with atrial flutter were older, 64.7 ± 9.7 versus 52.4 ± 16.8 years (<.001), and more often male (34/41 vs. 31/57 [.003]). The AFL group mean RACT (132.6 ± 17.3 ms) was significantly longer than that of controls (99.1 ± 11.6 ms) (p < .001). A RACT cut-off of 115.5 ms had a sensitivity and specificity of 92.7% and 93.0%, respectively for diagnosis of atrial flutter. A ROC curve indicated an AUC of 0.96 (95% CI: 0.93-1.0, p < .01).

Conclusion: RACT is a novel and promising marker of propensity for typical AFL. This data will inform larger prospective studies.

Keywords: ablation; atrial fibrillation; electroanatomic mapping; electrophysiological studies; typical atrial flutter; wavefront collision.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

References

REFERENCES

    1. Rahman F, Wang N, Yin X, et al. Atrial flutter: clinical risk factors and adverse outcomes in the Framingham heart study. Heart Rhythm. 2016;13:233-240.
    1. Gula LJ, Redfearn DP, Jenkyn KB, et al. Elevated incidence of atrial fibrillation and stroke in patients with atrial flutter-a population-Based study. Can J Cardiol. 2018;34:774-783.
    1. Natale A, Newby KH, Pisanó E, et al. Prospective randomized comparison of antiarrhythmic therapy versus first-line radiofrequency ablation in patients with atrial flutter. JACC. 2000;35:1898-1904.
    1. Voight J, Akkaya M, Somasundaram P, et al. Risk of new-onset atrial fibrillation and stroke after radiofrequency ablation of isolated, typical atrial flutter. Heart Rhythm. 2014;11:1884-1889.
    1. Liao J, Khalid Z, Scallan C, Morillo C, O'Donnell M. Noninvasive cardiac monitoring for detecting paroxysmal atrial fibrillation or flutter after acute ischemic stroke: a systematic review. Stroke. 2007;38:2935-2940.

LinkOut - more resources