Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Jul 1;35(4):296-300.
doi: 10.1097/CCO.0000000000000958. Epub 2023 May 12.

Treatment of radiation-associated angiosarcoma

Affiliations
Review

Treatment of radiation-associated angiosarcoma

Armelle Dufresne et al. Curr Opin Oncol. .

Abstract

Purpose of review: Radiation-associated angiosarcoma is a cutaneous aggressive tumor that is very rare and it represents a specific entity poorly studied in literature. It requires new therapeutic opportunity.

Recent findings: The complete surgical resection with negative margins is the mainstay treatment of localized treatment, even though it is difficult to reach in case of diffuse cutaneous infiltration. Adjuvant re-irradiation may improve local control with no benefit demonstrated on survival. Many systemic treatments can be efficient not only in metastatic setting but also in neoadjuvant setting in case of diffuse presentation. These treatments have never been compared to each other; the most efficient regimen remains to be determined, and a high heterogeneity of treatment is observed, even between sarcoma reference centers.

Summary: Immune therapy represents the most promising treatment under development. At the time of building clinical trial to assess the efficacy of immune therapy, the lack of randomized studies prevents the identification of a strong and consensual reference arm treatment. Given the rarity of the disease, only international collaborative clinical trials may have a chance to include enough patients to draw any conclusion and so will have to counteract the heterogeneity of management.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. WHO Classification of Ttumors. 5th edition. Soft tissue and bone tumours. International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2020.
    1. Young RJ, Brown NJ, MW Reed MW, et al. Angiosarcoma. Lancet Oncol 2010; 11:983–991.
    1. Mery CM, George S, Bertagnolli MM, Raut CP. Secondary sarcomas after radiotherapy for breast cancer: sustained risk and poor survival. Cancer 2009; 115:4055–4063.
    1. ESMO Guidelines Committee, EURACAN and GENTURIS. Soft tissue and visceral sarcomas: ESMO-EURACAN-GENTURIS Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 2021; 32:1348–1365.
    1. Merfeld E, Gabani P, Spraker MB, et al. Clinical outcomes and prognostic features of angiosarcoma: significance of prior radiation therapy. Clin Oncol 2019; 31:232–241.