Comparison of functional and oncological outcome of conformal sphincter preservation operation, low anterior resection, and abdominoperineal resection in very low rectal cancer: a retrospective comparative cohort study with propensity score matching
- PMID: 37222797
- DOI: 10.1007/s00423-023-02925-1
Comparison of functional and oncological outcome of conformal sphincter preservation operation, low anterior resection, and abdominoperineal resection in very low rectal cancer: a retrospective comparative cohort study with propensity score matching
Abstract
Purpose: Conformal sphincter preservation operation (CSPO) procedure is a sphincter preservation procedure for preserving the anal canal function for very low rectal cancers. This study investigated the functional and oncological outcome of conformal sphincter preservation operation by comparing with low anterior resection (LAR) and abdominoperineal resection (APR).
Methods: This is a retrospective comparative study. Patients who received conformal sphincter preservation operation (n = 52), low anterior resection (n = 54), or abdominoperineal resection (n = 69) were included between 2011 and 2016 in a tertiary referral hospital. Propensity score matching was applied to adjust the baseline characteristics which may influence the choice of the surgical procedure.
Results: Twenty-one pairs of conformal sphincter preservation operation vs. low anterior resection and 29 pairs of conformal sphincter preservation operation vs. abdominoperineal resection were selected. The first group had a higher tumor location than the second group. Compared with the low anterior resection group, the conformal sphincter preservation operation group had shorter distal resection margins; however, no significant differences were identified in daily stool frequency, Wexner incontinence score, local recurrence, distant metastasis, overall survival, and disease-free survival between both groups. Compared with the abdominoperineal resection group, the conformal sphincter preservation operation group had shorter operative time and shorter postoperative hospital stay. No significant differences were identified in local recurrence, distant metastasis, overall survival, and disease-free survival.
Conclusion: Conformal sphincter preservation operation is oncologically safe compared to APR and LAR, and has similar functional findings to LAR. Studies comparing CSPO with intersphincteric resection should be performed.
Keywords: Abdominoperineal resection; Conformal sphincter preservation; Low anterior resection; Propensity score matching; Very low rectal cancer.
© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
Similar articles
-
Comparison of anal function and quality of life after conformal sphincter preservation operation and intersphincteric resection of very low rectal cancer: a multicenter, retrospective, case-control analysis.Tech Coloproctol. 2023 Dec;27(12):1275-1287. doi: 10.1007/s10151-023-02819-w. Epub 2023 May 29. Tech Coloproctol. 2023. PMID: 37248369 Free PMC article.
-
Retrospective study of the functional and oncological outcomes of conformal sphincter preservation operation in the treatment of very low rectal cancer.Tech Coloproctol. 2020 Oct;24(10):1025-1034. doi: 10.1007/s10151-020-02229-2. Epub 2020 May 2. Tech Coloproctol. 2020. PMID: 32361871 Free PMC article.
-
Sphincter-saving surgery versus abdominoperineal resection in low rectal cancer following neoadjuvant treatment with propensity score analysis.Surg Endosc. 2022 Apr;36(4):2623-2630. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08558-z. Epub 2021 May 18. Surg Endosc. 2022. PMID: 34008108
-
[Sphincter-saving resection for low rectal cancer].Nihon Geka Gakkai Zasshi. 2011 Sep;112(5):318-24. Nihon Geka Gakkai Zasshi. 2011. PMID: 21941822 Review. Japanese.
-
Possibilities of extensive surgery.Recent Results Cancer Res. 1998;146:59-65. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-71967-7_5. Recent Results Cancer Res. 1998. PMID: 9670249 Review.
Cited by
-
Sphincter-preserving surgical techniques in low rectal cancer management: A systematic review of contemporary evidence.World J Gastrointest Surg. 2025 Jul 27;17(7):107525. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i7.107525. World J Gastrointest Surg. 2025. PMID: 40740930 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Zbar AP (2007) Sir W. Ernest Miles. Tech Coloproctol 11(1):71–74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-007-0333-2 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Inoue Y, Kusunoki M (2010) Resection of rectal cancer: a historical review. Surg Today 40(6):501–506. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-009-4153-z - DOI - PubMed
-
- Sun G, Lou Z, Zhang H, Yu G, Zheng K, Gao X, Meng R, Gong H, Furnée E, Bai C (2020) Retrospective study of the functional and oncological outcomes of conformal sphincter preservation operation in the treatment of very low rectal cancer. In: Techniques in coloproctology
-
- Hieda K, Cho KH, Arakawa T, Fujimiya M, Murakami G, Matsubara A (2013) Nerves in the intersphincteric space of the human anal canal with special reference to their continuation to the enteric nerve plexus of the rectum. Clin Anat 26(7):843–854. https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.22227 - DOI - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous