Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Nov;27(11):3669-3677.
doi: 10.1007/s10461-023-04083-3. Epub 2023 May 24.

High Rate of HIV Among Trauma Patients Participating in Routine Emergency Department Screening

Affiliations

High Rate of HIV Among Trauma Patients Participating in Routine Emergency Department Screening

Kimberly A Stanford et al. AIDS Behav. 2023 Nov.

Abstract

Limited published data suggest rates of HIV may be high among trauma patients. This study compares rates of HIV screening and diagnosis among trauma and medical patients at a Level 1 trauma center emergency department (ED) with a universal HIV screening program. This is a retrospective cross-sectional study of all ED encounters from May 1, 2018, through May 1, 2021. Duplicate encounters, encounters with repeat testing within one year, and patients younger than 18 or older than 65 were excluded. Chi-squared analysis was used to compare demographics, rates of HIV testing, new and known HIV infections, and linkage to care between trauma and medical patients. After exclusion criteria were applied, 147,430 encounters from 91,468 unique patients were analyzed. Trauma comprised 7,497 (5.4%) encounters. Trauma patients were less likely to be screened for HIV than medical patients (18.1% vs 25.6%; OR 0.64; 95%CI, 0.61-0.68, p < .01). Trauma patients had higher rates of HIV (2.2% vs 1.3%; OR 1.78; 95% CI, 1.22-2.58, p < .01). Both trauma and medical patients would benefit from strategies to increase screening. Including trauma patients in routine ED HIV screening should be a priority to increase diagnosis rate and linkage to care in key populations.

Keywords: ED screening; Emergency department; HIV screening; Opt-out; Trauma.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors did not receive support from any organization for the submitted work. The authors have no competing interests to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Exclusion Criteria Flow Chart

References

    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Branson BM, Handsfield HH, et al. Revised recommendations for HIV testing of adults, adolescents, and pregnant women in health-care settings. MMWR Recomm Rep Morb Mortal Wkly Rep Recomm Rep. 2006;55(RR–14):1–17. - PubMed
    1. Escudero DJ, Bahamon M, Panakos P, Hercz D, Seage GR, Merchant RC. How to best conduct universal HIV screening in emergency departments is far from settled. J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. 2021;2(1):e12352. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Haukoos JS, Hopkins E, Conroy AA, et al. Routine opt-out rapid HIV screening and detection of HIV infection in emergency department patients. JAMA. 2010;304(3):284–92. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.953. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hoenigl M, Mathur K, Blumenthal J, et al. Universal HIV and Birth Cohort HCV Screening in San Diego Emergency Departments. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):14479. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-51128-6. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bath R, Ahmad K, Orkin C. Routine HIV testing within the emergency department of a major trauma centre: a pilot study. HIV Med. 2015;16(5):326–8. doi: 10.1111/hiv.12216. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources