Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 May 8:14:1153462.
doi: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1153462. eCollection 2023.

Associations between urinary iodine concentration and the prevalence of metabolic disorders: a cross-sectional study

Affiliations

Associations between urinary iodine concentration and the prevalence of metabolic disorders: a cross-sectional study

Xia Shen et al. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). .

Abstract

Background: Few studies have examined the role of iodine in extrathyroidal function. Recent research has shown an association between iodine and metabolic syndromes (MetS) in Chinese and Korean populations, but the link in the American participants remains unknown.

Purpose: This study aimed to examine the relationship between iodine status and metabolic disorders, including components associated with metabolic syndrome, hypertension, hyperglycemia, central obesity, triglyceride abnormalities, and low HDL.

Methods: The study included 11,545 adults aged ≥ 18 years from the US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (2007-2018). Participants were divided into four groups based on their iodine nutritional status(ug/L), as recommended by the World Health Organization: low UIC, < 100; normal UIC, 100-299; high UIC, 300-399; and very high, ≥ 400. The Odds ratio (OR) for MetS basing the UIC group was estimated using logistic regression models for our overall population and subgroups.

Results: Iodine status was positively associated with the prevalence of MetS in US adults. The risk of MetS was significantly higher in those with high UIC than in those with normal UIC [OR: 1.25; 95% confidence intervals (CI),1.016-1.539; p = 0.035). The risk of MetS was lower in the low UIC group (OR,0.82; 95% CI: 0.708-0.946; p = 0.007). There was a significant nonlinear trend between UIC and the risk of MetS, diabetes, and obesity in overall participants. Participants with high UIC had significantly increased TG elevation (OR, 1.24; 95% CI: 1.002-1.533; P = 0.048) and participants with very high UIC had significantly decreased risk of diabetes (OR, 0.83; 95% CI: 0.731-0.945, p = 0.005). Moreover, subgroup analysis revealed an interaction between UIC and MetS in participants aged < 60 years and ≥ 60 years, and no association between UIC and MetS in older participants aged ≥ 60 years.

Conclusion: Our study validated the relationship between UIC and MetS and their components in US adults. This association may provide further dietary control strategies for the management of patients with metabolic disorders.

Keywords: NHANES; epidemiology; iodine; metabolic disorders; metabolism.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The Flow Chart of Inclusion and Exclusion in the study.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Restricted cubic spline plot of the association between UIC and MetS and components in participants of American adults (age ≥ 18). (A) Prevalence of metabolic syndrome (MetS); (B) Prevalence of diabetes mellitus (Diabetes); (C) Prevalence of obesity; (D) Prevalence of hypertension; (E) Prevalence of low High-density lipoprotein (low-HDL-C); (F) Prevalence of triglycerides (TG). Adjusted for age, sex, race/ethnicity, education, annual family income, smoking status, alcohol intake, physical activity, thyroid problems, cancer, energy intake, fish or shellfish intake, sodium intake, eGFR (Glomerular filtration rate), TSH, and FT4.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Association Between UIC (log10) and metabolic syndrome (MetS). Each stratification was adjusted for age, sex, race/ethnicity, education, annual family income, smoking status, alcohol intake, physical activity, thyroid problems, cancer, energy intake, fish or shellfish intake, sodium intake, eGFR (Glomerular filtration rate), TSH, and FT4.

References

    1. He J, Lai Y, Yang J, Yao Y, Li Y, Teng W, et al. . The relationship between thyroid function and metabolic syndrome and its components: a cross-sectional study in a Chinese population. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) (2021) 12:661160. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2021.661160 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Aguilar M, Bhuket T, Torres S, Liu B, Wong RJ. Prevalence of the metabolic syndrome in the united states, 2003-2012. JAMA (2015) 313(19):1973–4. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.4260 - DOI - PubMed
    1. de Siqueira Valadares LT, de Souza LSB, Salgado Júnior VA, de Freitas Bonomo L, de Macedo LR, Silva M. Prevalence of metabolic syndrome in Brazilian adults in the last 10 years: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Public Health (2022) 22(1):327. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-12753-5 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Malik S, Wong ND, Franklin SS, Kamath TV, L'Italien GJ, Pio JR, et al. . Impact of the metabolic syndrome on mortality from coronary heart disease, cardiovascular disease, and all causes in united states adults. Circulation (2004) 110(10):1245–50. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000140677.20606.0E - DOI - PubMed
    1. Esposito K, Chiodini P, Colao A, Lenzi A, Giugliano D. Metabolic syndrome and risk of cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabetes Care (2012) 35(11):2402–11. doi: 10.2337/dc12-0336 - DOI - PMC - PubMed