A scalable approach to determine cervical cancer screening needs among emergency department patients in the United States
- PMID: 37223552
- PMCID: PMC10201821
- DOI: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2023.102221
A scalable approach to determine cervical cancer screening needs among emergency department patients in the United States
Abstract
The emergency department patient population is disproportionately under-screened for cancer, making it an optimal environment to promote cancer screening among hard-to-reach populations and those without routine access to primary care. The first step in a cancer screening process is identifying screening eligibility (e.g. age, sex) and need (i.e. due or past due). In an effort to support the scalability of an emergency department (ED)-based cervical cancer screening intervention, we examined the performance of a low-resource approach of determining cervical cancer screening needs among ED patients. A convenience sample of ED patients (N = 2807) was randomized to (a) an in-person interview with human subjects research staff or, (b) a self-administered, tablet computer-based survey for determining cervical cancer eligibility and need. Patients were recruited from a high-volume urban ED in Rochester, NY and a low-volume rural ED in Dansville, NY between December 2020 and December 2022. Results of these approaches were compared for equivalence of method for determining adherence status with screening guidelines and under/over-reporting of screening activity. Nearly identical reported rates of non-adherence with screening were identified across conditions (1.7% absolute difference; Χ21 = 0.96, p = 0.33). Our results demonstrate that a low-resource approach of using a tablet-based self-administered survey to determine cervical cancer screening needs is equivalent to a labor intensive in-person interview approach conducted by trained research staff among ED patients.
Keywords: Cancer screening; Cancer screening eligibility; Cancer screening survey; Cervical cancer prevention; Cervical cancer screening; Emergency department; Emergency medicine.
© 2023 The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Similar articles
-
Comparing Cancer Primary and Secondary Prevention Documentation Between Different Digital Health Approaches in the Emergency Department.Womens Health Rep (New Rochelle). 2024 Sep 26;5(1):689-696. doi: 10.1089/whr.2024.0104. eCollection 2024. Womens Health Rep (New Rochelle). 2024. PMID: 39463472 Free PMC article.
-
An Intervention to Increase Uptake of Cervical Cancer Screening Among Emergency Department Patients: Results of a Randomized Pilot Study.J Emerg Med. 2019 Dec;57(6):836-843. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2019.07.021. Epub 2019 Oct 5. J Emerg Med. 2019. PMID: 31594738 Free PMC article.
-
Trends in Emergency Department Use by Rural and Urban Populations in the United States.JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Apr 5;2(4):e191919. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.1919. JAMA Netw Open. 2019. PMID: 30977849 Free PMC article.
-
Identifying models of care to improve outcomes for older people with urgent care needs: a mixed methods approach to develop a system dynamics model.Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2023 Sep;11(14):1-183. doi: 10.3310/NLCT5104. Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2023. PMID: 37830206 Review.
-
Adherence to guideline creation recommendations for suicide prevention in the emergency department: A systematic review.Am J Emerg Med. 2021 Dec;50:553-560. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2021.07.042. Epub 2021 Jul 30. Am J Emerg Med. 2021. PMID: 34547697
Cited by
-
Low-cost interventions to increase uptake of cervical cancer screening among emergency department patients: Results of a randomized clinical trial.Acad Emerg Med. 2025 Jul;32(7):776-784. doi: 10.1111/acem.15101. Epub 2025 Jan 28. Acad Emerg Med. 2025. PMID: 39873883 Clinical Trial.
References
-
- Cella D., Riley W., Stone A., Rothrock N., Reeve B., Yount S., Amtmann D., Bode R., Buysse D., Choi S., Cook K., DeVellis R., DeWalt D., Fries J.F., Gershon R., Hahn E.A., Lai J.-S., Pilkonis P., Revicki D., Rose M., Weinfurt K., Hays R. The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) developed and tested its first wave of adult self-reported health outcome item banks: 2005–2008. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 2010;63(11):1179–1194. - PMC - PubMed
-
- Cook K.F., Jensen S.E., Schalet B.D., Beaumont J.L., Amtmann D., Czajkowski S., Dewalt D.A., Fries J.F., Pilkonis P.A., Reeve B.B., Stone A.A., Weinfurt K.P., Cella D. PROMIS measures of pain, fatigue, negative affect, physical function, and social function demonstrated clinical validity across a range of chronic conditions. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 2016;73:89–102. - PMC - PubMed
-
- Curry S.J., Krist A.H., Owens D.K., Barry M.J., Caughey A.B., Davidson K.W., Doubeni C.A., Epling J.W., Kemper A.R., Kubik M., Landefeld C.S., Mangione C.M., Phipps M.G., Silverstein M., Simon M.A., Tseng C.-W., Wong J.B. Screening for Cervical Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement. JAMA. 2018;320(7):674. - PubMed
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous