Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Jun;25(6):323-330.
doi: 10.1007/s11883-023-01104-3. Epub 2023 May 24.

Implementing Reporting Standards for Polygenic Risk Scores for Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease

Johanna L Smith  1 , Daniel J Schaid  2 , Iftikhar J Kullo  3   4
Affiliations
Review

Implementing Reporting Standards for Polygenic Risk Scores for Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease

Johanna L Smith et al. Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2023 Jun.

Abstract

Purpose of review: There is considerable interest in using polygenic risk scores (PRSs) for assessing risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). A barrier to the clinical use of PRSs is heterogeneity in how PRS studies are reported. In this review, we summarize approaches to establish a uniform reporting framework for PRSs for coronary heart disease (CHD), the most common form of ASCVD.

Recent findings: Reporting standards for PRSs need to be contextualized for disease specific applications. In addition to metrics of predictive performance, reporting standards for PRSs for CHD should include how cases/control were ascertained, degree of adjustment for conventional CHD risk factors, portability to diverse genetic ancestry groups and admixed individuals, and quality control measures for clinical deployment. Such a framework will enable PRSs to be optimized and benchmarked for clinical use.

Keywords: Atherosclerosis; Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease; Coronary heart disease; Polygenic risk score; Reporting standards.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations

Conflict of Interest The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
An example of a PRS workflow. Created with BioRender.com
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Global (A) and local (B) genetic ancestry in a Latino individual. Genetic ancestry population proportions are represented as blue for European, green for African, and red for Native Admixed American. Created with BioRender.com
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Mahmood SS, Levy D, Vasan RS, Wang TJ. The Framingham Heart Study and the epidemiology of cardiovascular disease: a historical perspective. The Lancet. 2014;383(9921):999–1008. 10.1016/s0140-6736(13)61752-3. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dawber TR, Meadors GF, Moore FE. Epidemiological approaches to heart disease: the Framingham Study. Am J Public Health Nations Health. 1951;41(3):279–86. 10.2105/ajph.41.3.279. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Karmali KN, Goff DC, Ning H, Lloyd-Jones D. A systematic examination of the 2013 ACC/AHA pooled cohort risk assessment tool for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;64(10):959–68. 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.06.1186. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Muntner P, Colantonio LD, Cushman M, Goff DC, Howard G, Howard VJ, et al. Validation of the atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease pooled cohort risk equations. JAMA. 2014;311(14):1406. 10.1001/jama.2014.2630. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kullo IJ, Trejo-Gutierrez JF, Lopez-Jimenez F, Thomas RJ, Allison TG, Mulvagh SL, et al. A perspective on the New American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines for cardiovascular risk assessment. Mayo Clin. Proc 2014;89(9):1244–56. 10.1016/j.mayocp.2014.06.018. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types