Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 May 24;18(5):e0285863.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0285863. eCollection 2023.

Impact of Korea's emissions trading scheme on publicly traded firms

Affiliations

Impact of Korea's emissions trading scheme on publicly traded firms

Nyonho O et al. PLoS One. .

Erratum in

Abstract

Reducing fossil fuel energy consumption and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions is vital to protecting life on the planet. Globally, emissions trading schemes are gaining traction as one way to curb emissions. However, the evidence of their effectiveness remains scarce. To address this gap, we examine the impact of Korea's Emissions Trading Scheme (KETS), the first nationally mandated cap-and-trade program in East Asia to reduce GHG emissions, relative to its pre-existing command-and-control regulation called the Target Management System for Greenhouse Gases and Energy (TMS). Using panel data for publicly traded firms between 2011 and 2017, we apply a combination of panel data estimators and matching methods. We find that KETS did not significantly reduce emissions by firms but may have improved the aggregate efficiency in energy use in the energy and manufacturing sectors. Given the low levels of noncompliance with the first phase of the policy, it is likely that firms purchased permits and offsets or used previously banked permits to meet policy targets. Our work is one of the first efforts to understand the impact of KETS and the mechanisms underpinning its impact.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Average GHG emissions.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Average energy consumption.
Fig 3
Fig 3. Average sales of control group.
Fig 4
Fig 4. Average profits of control group.
Fig 5
Fig 5. Average GHG emissions of control group.
Fig 6
Fig 6. Average energy consumption of control group.

References

    1. Montgomery WD. Markets in licenses and efficient pollution control programs. Journal of economic theory. 1972;5: 395–418.
    1. Baumol WJ, Oates WE. The theory of environmental policy. 2nd ed. Cambridge Cambridgeshire; New York: Cambridge University Press; 1988.
    1. World Bank Group. State and Trends of Carbon Pricing 2022. Washington, DC: World Bank; 2022 May. doi: 10.1596/978-1-4648-1895-0 - DOI
    1. Central Intelligence Agency. Korea, South—The World Factbook. 28 Mar 2023. [cited 3 Apr 2023]. Available: https://www.cia.gov/the-world-factbook/countries/korea-south/
    1. ICAP. Emissions Trading Worldwide: Status Report 2023. Berlin: International Carbon Action Partnership; 2023.

Substances