Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 May 25;5(1):22.
doi: 10.1186/s42466-023-00247-7.

Large-vessel-occlusion in patients with previous ischemic stroke: an analysis of adherence to secondary preventive medication for different etiologies

Affiliations

Large-vessel-occlusion in patients with previous ischemic stroke: an analysis of adherence to secondary preventive medication for different etiologies

Konstantin Kohlhase et al. Neurol Res Pract. .

Abstract

Background: Large vessel occlusion (LVO) is a severe condition that carries a high risk of morbidity and mortality, underscoring the importance of effective prevention strategies. This retrospective study aimed to analyze the intake of preventive medication at the time of hospitalization in a cohort of recurrent stroke patients presenting with acute LVO.

Methods: The study assessed the intake of either platelet aggregation inhibitors (PAI), oral anticoagulants (OAC) or statins at admission in patients with recurrent stroke and correlated it with the final classification of LVO. The frequency of those secondary preventive medication in recurrent stroke patients was defined as primary endpoint. The Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at discharge was used as a functional outcome and defined as a secondary outcome measure.

Results: This study included 866 patients who were treated for LVO between 2016 and 2020, of whom 160 (18.5%) had a recurrent ischemic stroke. OAC (25.6% vs. 14.1%, p < 0.01), PAI (50.0% vs. 26.0%, p < 0.01), or statin therapy (50.6% vs. 20.8%, p < 0.01) at admission were significantly more frequent in recurrent stroke patients compared to patients with a first-time stroke. Concerning LVO etiology in recurrent stroke patients, OAC at admission was taken in 46.8% of cardioembolic LVO, whereas PAI and statin at admission in macroangiopathic LVO were administered to 40.0%; neither PAI nor OAC was taken in 26.0%, 28.3%, and 31.6% of cardioembolic, macroangiopathic, or cryptogenic strokes, respectively. Regardless of stroke recurrence or etiology, there was an increase in mRS at discharge.

Conclusions: Despite high-quality healthcare, this study suggested a significant proportion of patients with recurrent stroke who were either non-adherent or insufficiently adherent to secondary preventive medication. Given the disability associated with LVO, improving patients' medication adherence and identifying unknown stroke causes are crucial for effective prevention strategies.

Keywords: Large vessel occlusion; Secondary prophylaxis; Stroke unit.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

KK reports a grant from Merck Serono GmbH. FB reports personal fees and grants from AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb (BMS), Boehringer, Laerdal and Stryker. FR reports personal fees from Angelini Pharma, Desitin Arzneimittel, Eisai GmbH, Jazz Pharma, Roche Pharma, UCB Pharma, and Zogenix and grants from the Detlev-Wrobel-Fonds for Epilepsy Research, the Chaja-Foundation Frankfurt, the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, the LOEWE Programme of the State of Hesse, and the European Union. FR reports, that he is a part of the editorial board of Neurological Research and Practice. AS reports personal fees and grants from Angelini Pharma/Arvelle Therapeutics, Desitin Arzneimittel, Eisai, Jazz (GW) Pharmaceuticals companies, Marinus Pharma, Takeda, UCB, UNEEG medical, and Zogenix. AS reports, that he is a part of the editorial board of Neurological Research and Practice. None of the other authors report conflicts of interest.

Figures

Table 4
Table 4
Functional outcome, indicated by mRS before admission and at discharge, among different stroke etiologies (cardioembolic, large-artery sclerosis/macroangiopathic, cryptogenic) and between patients with and without a positive history of previous ischemic stroke. Statistical tests used were based on the scale of variables (ordinal or nominal) and dependence, as indicated. A p-value < 0.05 was considered significant and marked in bold
Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Functional outcome indicated by mRS (modified Rankin Scale) before admission and at discharge between patients with acute LVO due to cardioembolism or large-artery stenosis, subdivided into a positive history of previous ischemic (non-classified) stroke

References

    1. Li, L., Scott, C. A., & Rothwell, P. M. (2020). Trends in Stroke Incidence in High-Income Countries in the 21st Century: Population-Based Study and Systematic Review. Stroke, 1372–1380. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.028484 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Appelros P, Nydevik I, Viitanen M. Poor outcome after first-ever stroke. Stroke. 2003;34(1):122–126. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000047852.05842.3C. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sennfält S, Norrving B, Petersson J, Ullberg T. Long-term survival and function after stroke. Stroke. 2019;50(1):53–61. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.022913. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Brønnum-Hansen H, Davidsen M, Thorvaldsen P. Long-term survival and causes of death after stroke. Stroke. 2001;32(9):2131–2136. doi: 10.1161/HS0901.094253. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Strilciuc S, Grad DA, Radu C, Chira D, Stan A, Ungureanu M, Gheorghe A, Muresanu FD. The economic burden of stroke: A systematic review of cost of illness studies. Journal of Medicine and Life. 2021;14(5):606. doi: 10.25122/JML-2021-0361. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources