Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) in twin pregnancies affected by early single fetal demise: A systematic review of NIPT and vanishing twins
- PMID: 37226326
- DOI: 10.1002/pd.6388
Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) in twin pregnancies affected by early single fetal demise: A systematic review of NIPT and vanishing twins
Abstract
The screening performance of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) in vanishing twin (VT) pregnancies is relatively unknown. To close this knowledge gap, we conducted a systematic review of the available literature. Studies describing the test performance of NIPT for trisomy 21, 18, 13, sex chromosomes and additional findings in pregnancies with a VT were retrieved from a literature search with a publication date until October 4, 2022. The methodological quality of the studies was assessed with the quality assessment tool for diagnostic accuracy studies-2 (QUADAS-2). The screen positive rate of the pooled data and the pooled positive predictive value (PPV) were calculated using a random effects model. Seven studies, with cohort sizes ranging from 5 to 767, were included. The screen positive rate of the pooled data for trisomy 21 was 35/1592 (2.2%), with a PPV of 20% (confirmation in 7/35 cases [95% CI 9.8%-36%]). For trisomy 18, the screen positive rate was 13/1592 (0.91%) and the pooled PPV 25% [95% CI 1.3%-90%]. The screen positive rate for trisomy 13 was 7/1592 (0.44%) and confirmed in 0/7 cases (pooled PPV 0% [95% CI 0%-100%]). The screen positive rate for additional findings was 23/767 (2.9%), of which none could be confirmed. No discordant negative results were reported. There is insufficient data to fully evaluate NIPT performance in pregnancies with a VT. However, existing studies suggest that NIPT can successfully detect common autosomal aneuploidies in pregnancies affected by a VT but with a higher false positive rate. Further studies are needed to determine the optimal timing of NIPT in VT pregnancies.
© 2023 The Authors. Prenatal Diagnosis published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Van Den Bogaert K , Lannoo L , Brison N , et al. Outcome of publicly funded nationwide first-tier noninvasive prenatal screening. Genet Med. 2021;23(6):1137-1142. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41436-021-01101-4
-
- van der Meij KRM , Sistermans EA , Macville MVE , et al. TRIDENT-2: national implementation of genome-wide non-invasive prenatal testing as a first-tier screening test in the Netherlands. Am J Hum Genet. 2019;105(6):1091-1101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajhg.2019.10.005
-
- Gil MM , Accurti V , Santacruz B , Plana MN , Nicolaides KH . Analysis of cell-free DNA in maternal blood in screening for aneuploidies: updated meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017;50(3):302-314. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.17484
-
- Santorum M , Wright D , Syngelaki A , Karagioti N , Nicolaides KH . Accuracy of first-trimester combined test in screening for trisomies 21, 18 and 13. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017;49(6):714-720. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.17283
-
- Nicolaides KH . Screening for fetal aneuploidies at 11 to 13 weeks. Prenat Diagn. 2011;31(1):7-15. https://doi.org/10.1002/pd.2637
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous