Asking about self-harm during risk assessment in psychosocial assessments in the emergency department: questions that facilitate and deter disclosure of self-harm
- PMID: 37226481
- PMCID: PMC10228282
- DOI: 10.1192/bjo.2023.32
Asking about self-harm during risk assessment in psychosocial assessments in the emergency department: questions that facilitate and deter disclosure of self-harm
Abstract
Background: Emergency departments are key settings for suicide prevention. Most people are deemed to be at no or low risk in final contacts before death.
Aim: To micro-analyse how clinicians ask about suicidal ideation and/or self-harm in emergency department psychosocial assessments and how patients respond.
Method: Forty-six psychosocial assessments between mental health clinicians and people with suicidal ideation and/or self-harm were video-recorded. Verbal and non-verbal features of 55 question-answer sequences about self-harm thoughts and/or actions were micro-analysed using conversation analysis. Fisher's exact test was used to test the hypothesis that question type was associated with patient disclosure.
Results: (a) Eighty-four per cent of initial questions (N = 46/55) were closed yes/no questions about self-harm thoughts and/or feelings, plans to self-harm, potential for future self-harm, predicting risk of future self-harm and being okay or keeping safe. Patients disclosed minimal information in response to closed questions, whereas open questions elicited ambivalent and information rich responses. (b) All closed questions were leading, with 54% inviting no and 46% inviting yes. When patients were asked no-inviting questions, the disclosure rate was 8%, compared to 65% when asked yes-inviting questions (P < 0.05 Fisher's exact test). (c) Patients struggled to respond when asked to predict future self-harm or guarantee safety. (d) Half of closed questions had a narrow timeframe (e.g. at the moment, overnight) or were tied to possible discharge.
Conclusion: Across assessments, there is a bias towards not uncovering thoughts and plans of self-harm through the cumulative effect of leading questions that invite a no response, their narrow timeframe and tying questions to possible discharge. Open questions, yes-inviting questions and asking how people feel about the future facilitate disclosure.
Keywords: Suicide; communication; conversation analysis; emergency department; risk assessment.
Conflict of interest statement
None.
Similar articles
-
Implying implausibility and undermining versus accepting peoples' experiences of suicidal ideation and self-harm in Emergency Department psychosocial assessments.Front Psychiatry. 2023 Aug 30;14:1197512. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1197512. eCollection 2023. Front Psychiatry. 2023. PMID: 37711424 Free PMC article.
-
"This is a question we have to ask everyone": asking young people about self-harm and suicide.J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2016 Oct;23(8):479-488. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12323. Epub 2016 Aug 8. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2016. PMID: 27500689
-
How do healthcare professionals interview patients to assess suicide risk?BMC Psychiatry. 2017 Apr 4;17(1):122. doi: 10.1186/s12888-017-1212-7. BMC Psychiatry. 2017. PMID: 28372553 Free PMC article.
-
Prevalence of suicidal ideation and self-harm behaviours in children aged 12 years and younger: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Lancet Psychiatry. 2022 Sep;9(9):703-714. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(22)00193-6. Epub 2022 Jul 27. Lancet Psychiatry. 2022. PMID: 35907406
-
Self harm and attempted suicide in adults: 10 practical questions and answers for emergency department staff.Emerg Med J. 2006 Apr;23(4):251-5. doi: 10.1136/emj.2005.027250. Emerg Med J. 2006. PMID: 16549567 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Acceptability and content validity of suicidality screening items: a qualitative study with perinatal women.Front Psychiatry. 2024 Apr 11;15:1359076. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1359076. eCollection 2024. Front Psychiatry. 2024. PMID: 38666087 Free PMC article.
-
Implying implausibility and undermining versus accepting peoples' experiences of suicidal ideation and self-harm in Emergency Department psychosocial assessments.Front Psychiatry. 2023 Aug 30;14:1197512. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1197512. eCollection 2023. Front Psychiatry. 2023. PMID: 37711424 Free PMC article.
References
-
- World Health Organization. Suicide Fact Sheet. 2021. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/suicide [cited 6 Jun 2022].
-
- Pompili M, Belvederi Murri M, Patti S, Innamorati M, Lester D, Girardi P, et al. The communication of suicidal intentions: a meta-analysis. Psychol Med 2016; 46(11): 2239–53. - PubMed
-
- Isometsä ET, Keikkinen ME, Marttunen MJ, Henriksson MM, Aro HM, Lönnqvist JK. The last appointment before suicide: is suicide intent communicated? Am J Psychiatry 1995; 152(6): 919–22. - PubMed
-
- Appleby L, Kapur N, Shaw J, Hunt I, Ibrahim S, Turnbull P, et al. National Confidential Inquiry into Suicide and Safety in Mental Health Annual Report: England, Northern Ireland, Scotland and Wales. University of Manchester, 2019. (https://documents.manchester.ac.uk/display.aspx?DocID=46558).
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources