Assessment of severity scoring systems for predicting mortality in critically ill patients receiving continuous renal replacement therapy
- PMID: 37228073
- PMCID: PMC10212150
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0286246
Assessment of severity scoring systems for predicting mortality in critically ill patients receiving continuous renal replacement therapy
Abstract
The incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI) is increasing every year and many patients with AKI admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) require continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT). This study compared and analyzed severity scoring systems to assess their suitability in predicting mortality in critically ill patients receiving CRRT. Data from 612 patients receiving CRRT in four ICUs of the Korea University Medical Center between January 2016 and November 2018 were retrospectively collected. The mean age of all patients was 67.6 ± 14.8 years, and the proportion of males was 59.6%. The endpoints were in-hospital mortality and 7-day mortality from the day of CRRT initiation to the date of death. The Program to Improve Care in Acute Renal Disease (PICARD), Demirjian's, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II, Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS) 3, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA), Multiple Organ Dysfunction Score (MODS), and Liano's scores were used to predict mortality. The in-hospital and 7-day mortality rates in the study population were 72.7% and 45.1%, respectively. The area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUROC) revealed the highest discrimination ability for Demirjian's score (0.770), followed by Liano's score (0.728) and APACHE II (0.710). The AUROC curves for the SAPS 3, MODS, and PICARD were 0.671, 0.665, and 0.658, respectively. The AUROC of Demirjian's score was significantly higher than that of the other scores, except for Liano's score. The Hosmer-Lemeshow test on Demirjian's score showed a poor fit in our analysis; however, it was more acceptable than general severity scores. Kidney-specific severity scoring systems showed better performance in predicting mortality in critically ill patients receiving CRRT than general severity scoring systems.
Copyright: © 2023 Park et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Figures
Similar articles
-
External Validation for Acute Kidney Injury Severity Scores: A Multicenter Retrospective Study in 14 Japanese ICUs.Am J Nephrol. 2015;42(1):57-64. doi: 10.1159/000439118. Am J Nephrol. 2015. PMID: 26337793
-
SOFA score is superior to APACHE-II score in predicting the prognosis of critically ill patients with acute kidney injury undergoing continuous renal replacement therapy.Ren Fail. 2020 Nov;42(1):638-645. doi: 10.1080/0886022X.2020.1788581. Ren Fail. 2020. PMID: 32660294 Free PMC article.
-
Superiority of Simplified Acute Physiologic Score II Compared with Acute Physiologic and Chronic Health Evaluation II and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Scores for Predicting 48-Hour Mortality in Patients Receiving Continuous Kidney Replacement Therapy.Nephron. 2022;146(4):369-376. doi: 10.1159/000521495. Epub 2022 Jan 31. Nephron. 2022. PMID: 35100603
-
Factors Associated with In-Hospital Mortality after Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy for Critically Ill Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Nov 26;17(23):8781. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17238781. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020. PMID: 33256008 Free PMC article.
-
Can Artificial Intelligence Assist in Delivering Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy?Adv Chronic Kidney Dis. 2022 Sep;29(5):439-449. doi: 10.1053/j.ackd.2022.08.001. Adv Chronic Kidney Dis. 2022. PMID: 36253027 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio Predicts Dialysis Timing & Prognosis in Critically Ill Patients.Health Sci Rep. 2025 Feb 3;8(2):e70313. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.70313. eCollection 2025 Feb. Health Sci Rep. 2025. PMID: 39906242 Free PMC article.
References
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources