Data on plant defense enzyme activity associated with three endophytes against Cornus florida Erysiphe pulchra powdery mildew
- PMID: 37228416
- PMCID: PMC10205428
- DOI: 10.1016/j.dib.2023.109220
Data on plant defense enzyme activity associated with three endophytes against Cornus florida Erysiphe pulchra powdery mildew
Abstract
Three bacteria endophytes that colonize flowering dogwood (Cornus florida) suppressed Erysiphe pulchra powdery mildew disease severity. The three bacteria identified as Stenotrophomonas sp. (B17A), Serratia marcescens (B17B), and Bacillus thuringiensis (IMC8) were assessed for plant defense enzymes associated with plant protection. Detached leaves inoculated with powdery mildew were spray treated with the selected bacterial isolates and incubated for 15 h, 26 h, 48 h and 72 h and then analyzed for activation of defense enzymes and Pathogenesis related (PR) proteins associated with induced systemic resistance (ISR) as a potential mode of action against powdery mildew. At each time point post treatment with the bacteria, leaf tissue was ground in liquid nitrogen and stored at -70°C for biochemical assay of enzyme activity. This data set presents the activation of enzyme activity for peroxidase (PO), polyphenol oxidase (PPO) and β -1,3-glucanase at 15 h, 26 h, 48 h and 72 h post treatment with bacteria as indicated by a change in absorbance min -1 mg-1 per gram fresh weight of leaves. The gene expression of the corresponding pathogenesis related (PR) protein for each bacterial treatment compared to the control was also analyzed using Real time PCR and five primers targeting PR1, PR2, and PR5. While changes for PO, PPO, and β -1,3-glucanase enzyme activities were observed at different time points post treatment with all three bacteria, expression of PR protein was detected for PR1, but it was negligible for PR2, and PR5.
Keywords: Biological control; Disease management; Plant growth promotion; Reducing pesticides.
© 2023 Published by Elsevier Inc.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Figures





References
-
- Rotich E., Mmbaga M.T. 2022. Replication Data on Bacterial Endophytes Providing Plant Defense. - DOI
-
- Karthikeyan M., Jayakumar V., Radhika K., Bhaskaran R., Velazhahan D. Alice R. Induction of resistance in host against the infection of leaf blight pathogen (Alternaria palandui) in onion (Allium cepa var aggregatum) Ind. J. Biochem. Biophys. 2005;42:371–377. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16955738/ - PubMed
-
- Pan S.Q., Ye X.S., Kuc J. A technique for detection of Chitinase, β-1,3-Glucanase and protein patterns after single separation using Polyacrylamide Gel electrophoresis or Isoelectrofocusing. Phytopathology. 1991;81:970–974. https://www.apsnet.orgPhyto81n09/970
-
- Naznin H.A., Kiyohara D., Kimura M., Miyazawa M., Shimizu M., Hyakumachi M. Systemic resistance induced by volatile organic compounds emitted by plant growth-promoting fungi in Arabidopsis thaliana. PLoS ONE. 2014;27 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0086882. PMID: 24475190; PMCID: PMC3903595. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Hammerschmidt R., Nuckles N.M., Kuc J. Association of enhanced peroxidase activity with induced systemic resistance of cucumber to Colletotrichum lagenarium. Physiol. Plant Pathol. 1982;20:73–82. doi: 10.1016/0048-4059(82)90025-X. - DOI
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials