Application of Semiautomatic Fetal Intelligent Navigation Echocardiography (FINE) in Twin Pregnancies: Half the Work or Twice the Effort?
- PMID: 37228519
- PMCID: PMC10207972
- DOI: 10.7759/cureus.38052
Application of Semiautomatic Fetal Intelligent Navigation Echocardiography (FINE) in Twin Pregnancies: Half the Work or Twice the Effort?
Abstract
Objective: To assess the performance of fetal intelligent navigation echocardiography (FINE, 5D Heart™) for automated volumetric investigation of the fetal heart in twin pregnancies.
Methods: Three hundred twenty-eight twin fetuses underwent fetal echocardiography in the second and third trimesters. Spatiotemporal image correlation (STIC) volumes were obtained for a volumetric investigation. The volumes were analyzed using the FINE software, and the data were investigated regarding image quality and many properly reconstructed planes.
Results: Three hundred and eight volumes underwent final analysis. 55.8% of the included pregnancies were dichorionic twin pregnancies, and 44.2% were monochorionic twin pregnancies. The mean gestational age (GA) was 22.1 weeks, and the mean maternal BMI was 27.3 kg/m2. The STIC-volume acquisition was successful in 100.0% and 95.5% of cases. The overall depiction rates of FINE were 96.5% (twin 1) and 94.7% (twin 2), respectively (p = 0.0849, not significant). In 95.9% (twin 1) and 93.9% (twin 2), at least 7 planes were reconstructed properly (p = 0.6056, not significant).
Conclusion: Our results indicate that the FINE technique used in twin pregnancies is reliable. No significant difference between the depiction rates of twin 1 and twin 2 could be detected. In addition, the depiction rates are as high as those derived from singleton pregnancies. Due to the challenges of fetal echocardiography in twin pregnancies (i.e., greater rates of cardiac anomaly and more difficult scans), the FINE technique might be a valuable tool to improve the quality of medical care in those pregnancies.
Keywords: 3d/4d; automatization; fetal echocardiography; spatiotemporal image correlation; stic; twin pregnancies; ultrasound.
Copyright © 2023, Gembicki et al.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Figures


References
-
- Congenital heart defects: the 10-year experience at a single center. Aydin E, Aypar E, Oktem A, et al. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2020;33:368–372. - PubMed
-
- Improved national prevalence estimates for 18 selected major birth defects - United States, 1999-2001. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm5451a2.htm. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2006;54:1301–1305. - PubMed
-
- Congenital heart defects according to the types of the risk factors - a single center experience. Pavlicek J, Klaskova E, Prochazka M, et al. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2019;32:3606–3611. - PubMed