Clinical outcomes and prognostic factors in non-cirrhotic non-neoplastic patients with portal vein thrombosis: A single-centre experience
- PMID: 37230857
- DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2023.05.007
Clinical outcomes and prognostic factors in non-cirrhotic non-neoplastic patients with portal vein thrombosis: A single-centre experience
Abstract
Introduction: The knowledge of natural history and prognostic factors of portal vein thrombosis (PVT) is still based on a limited number of studies.
Aim: To describe our single-center experience with 79 consecutive non-neoplastic non-cirrhotic patients with PVT (15 recent/64 chronic PVT).
Results: Among patients with recent PVT, 7 received anticoagulation alone, 4 systemic thrombolysis, 3 direct thrombolysis through a TIPS and 1 TIPS alone. Portal recanalization was achieved in 11 patients. In patients with chronic PVT, the rate of variceal progression was high (20% at one year and 50% at two years). The thrombotic involvement of splenic and superior mesenteric veins was the only risk factor for variceal enlargement. The cumulative bleeding rates were 10% at one year and 20% at two years. A multisegmental thrombosis and large varices at entry and a previous variceal bleeding were the independent predictors for variceal bleeding. The cumulative rate of new thrombotic events was 14% at one year and 18% at two years. Eight patients died, 2 because of thrombotic events. There were no bleeding-related deaths. Two-year cumulative survival rate was 90%.
Conclusions: Our study supports the importance of anticoagulation especially when a more extended thrombosis is present. Moreover, in patients with chronic PVT, the timing of follow-up endoscopy should be based on the extension of thrombosis and not, as in cirrhosis, on the size of varices at first endoscopy.
Keywords: Anticoagulation; Non-cirrhotic portal hypertension; Portal cavernoma; Portal vein thrombosis.
Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of interest The authors declare that no conflict of interest exists concerning this paper.
Similar articles
-
Comparison of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic with endoscopic treatment plus anticoagulation for esophageal variceal bleeding and portal vein thrombosis in liver cirrhosis.Scand J Gastroenterol. 2022 Dec;57(12):1494-1502. doi: 10.1080/00365521.2022.2094724. Epub 2022 Jul 8. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2022. PMID: 35802771
-
Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt may be superior to conservative therapy for variceal rebleeding in cirrhotic patients with non-tumoral portal vein thrombosis: a hypothesis.Med Sci Monit. 2012 Aug;18(8):HY37-41. doi: 10.12659/msm.883252. Med Sci Monit. 2012. PMID: 22847208 Free PMC article.
-
Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt for portal vein thrombosis with variceal bleeding in liver cirrhosis: outcomes and predictors in a prospective cohort study.Liver Int. 2016 May;36(5):667-76. doi: 10.1111/liv.12929. Epub 2015 Aug 28. Liver Int. 2016. PMID: 26235541
-
Portal vein thrombosis: an overview of current treatment options.Acta Gastroenterol Belg. 2021 Apr-Jun;84(2):327-332. doi: 10.51821/84.2.327. Acta Gastroenterol Belg. 2021. PMID: 34217184 Review.
-
Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts in portal vein thrombosis: A review.J Dig Dis. 2021 Sep;22(9):506-519. doi: 10.1111/1751-2980.13035. Epub 2021 Sep 3. J Dig Dis. 2021. PMID: 34323378 Review.
Cited by
-
Portal Vein Thrombosis in Patients Without Cirrhosis: Current Practical Approaches and Treatment Strategies.Diagnostics (Basel). 2025 Mar 13;15(6):721. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15060721. Diagnostics (Basel). 2025. PMID: 40150064 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Etiology and Risk Factors for Splanchnic Vein Thrombosis in Non-Cirrhotic, Non-Neoplastic Patients: A Narrative Review.Medicina (Kaunas). 2025 May 21;61(5):933. doi: 10.3390/medicina61050933. Medicina (Kaunas). 2025. PMID: 40428892 Free PMC article. Review.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical