Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 May 25;13(1):8459.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-35270-w.

Automated screening of potential organ donors using a temporal machine learning model

Affiliations

Automated screening of potential organ donors using a temporal machine learning model

Nicolas Sauthier et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

Organ donation is not meeting demand, and yet 30-60% of potential donors are potentially not identified. Current systems rely on manual identification and referral to an Organ Donation Organization (ODO). We hypothesized that developing an automated screening system based on machine learning could reduce the proportion of missed potentially eligible organ donors. Using routine clinical data and laboratory time-series, we retrospectively developed and tested a neural network model to automatically identify potential organ donors. We first trained a convolutive autoencoder that learned from the longitudinal changes of over 100 types of laboratory results. We then added a deep neural network classifier. This model was compared to a simpler logistic regression model. We observed an AUROC of 0.966 (CI 0.949-0.981) for the neural network and 0.940 (0.908-0.969) for the logistic regression model. At a prespecified cutoff, sensitivity and specificity were similar between both models at 84% and 93%. Accuracy of the neural network model was robust across donor subgroups and remained stable in a prospective simulation, while the logistic regression model performance declined when applied to rarer subgroups and in the prospective simulation. Our findings support using machine learning models to help with the identification of potential organ donors using routinely collected clinical and laboratory data.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
ROC Curves for all patients and subgroups of potential organ donors for the neural network (left) and the logistic model (right).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Simulation of a prospective analysis over 48 h before ICU discharge. ROC curve at each time point for the neural network (left) and the logistic model (right).

References

    1. Canadian Institute for Health Information. Annual Statistics on Organ Replacement in Canada: Dialysis, Transplantation and Donation, 2010 to 2019. https://www.cihi.ca/sites/default/files/document/corr-dialysis-transplan... (2019).
    1. Canadian Institute for Health Information. Summary Statistics on Organ Transplants, Wait-Lists and Donor: 2021 Statistics. (2022).
    1. Redelmeier DA, Markel F, Scales DC. Organ donation after death in Ontario: A population-based cohort study. CMAJ. 2013;185:E337–E344. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.122047. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Krmpotic K, Payne C, Isenor C, Dhanani S. Delayed referral results in missed opportunities for organ donation after circulatory death. Crit. Care Med. 2017;45:989–992. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002432. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kutsogiannis DJ, Asthana S, Townsend DR, Singh G, Karvellas CJ. The incidence of potential missed organ donors in intensive care units and emergency rooms: A retrospective cohort. Intensive Care Med. 2013;39:1452–1459. doi: 10.1007/s00134-013-2952-6. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types