Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023;29(3):213-221.
doi: 10.1159/000530194. Epub 2023 May 16.

Cannabis Consumers' View of Regulated Access to Recreational Cannabis: A Multisite Survey in Switzerland

Affiliations

Cannabis Consumers' View of Regulated Access to Recreational Cannabis: A Multisite Survey in Switzerland

Monika Müller et al. Eur Addict Res. 2023.

Abstract

Introduction: There is considerable effort in legalizing recreational use of cannabis globally. The successful implementation of a program of regulated access to recreational cannabis (PRAC) depends on the consumers' engagement. The aim of this study was to examine the acceptability of twelve different regulatory aspects by cannabis users including those obtaining cannabis from the illicit market and vulnerable populations such as young adults and problematic users.

Methods: The current study is a multisite online survey conducted in Switzerland. A total of 3,132 adult Swiss residents who consumed cannabis within the previous 30 days represented the studied population. Mean age was 30.5 years, 80.5% were men, and 64.2% of the participants stated that they always or often obtain cannabis from the illicit market. We described consumers' acceptability of twelve regulatory aspects concerning THC content control, disclosure of sensitive personal data, security aspects, and follow-up procedures by applying descriptive statistics and multiple regression models.

Results: THC content regulation showed most discrepancy with 89.4% of the participants stating to engage in a PRAC if five different THC contents were available as compared to 54% if only 12% THC was available. The least accepted regulatory aspect was disposal of contact details with an acceptability rate of 18.1%. Consumers mainly obtaining cannabis from the illicit market, young adults, and problematic users showed similar acceptability patterns. Participants obtaining cannabis from the illicit market were more likely to engage in a PRAC if five different THC contents were available as compared to participants obtaining cannabis from other sources (OR 1.94, 95% CI: 1.53-2.46).

Conclusion: A carefully designed PRAC that takes into account the consumers' perspective is likely to transfer them to the regulated market and to engage vulnerable populations. We cannot recommend the distribution of cannabis with only 12% THC content as this is unlikely to engage the target population.

Keywords: Cannabis legalization; Cannabis policy; Recreational cannabis; Regulated access to cannabis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Acceptability of twelve regulatory aspects of a program of regulated access to recreational cannabis (N = 3,132).
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Acceptability of twelve regulatory aspects according to illicit market as main source of cannabis supply*. Values are numbers (percentages) of participants expressing that they would probably or very probably engage in a corresponding program of regulated access to recreational cannabis. Adjusted odds ratios (ORs) # with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) and p values from complete case multivariable logistic regression models (N = 3,132). *Illicit market as main source of supply if participants often or always obtain cannabis from the illicit market. #Adjusted for gender, age, age at first use, self-reported consumer type, daily cannabis use, loss of control of consumption, impairment with leisure activities, impairment at work or school, problematic alcohol use OR >1.0 means participants often or always obtaining cannabis from illicit market are more likely to accept regulatory aspect as compared to participants sometimes, rarely or never buying cannabis on the illicit market.

References

    1. UNODC . Single convention on narcortic drugs. 1961. Available from:https://www.unodc.org/pdf/convention_1961_en.pdf.
    1. UNODC . World Drug Report 2019. 2019. Available from: https://wdr.unodc.org/wdr2019/prelaunch/WDR19_Booklet_5_CANNABIS_HALLUCI....
    1. GBD 2016 Alcohol and Drug Use Collaborators . The global burden of disease attributable to alcohol and drug use in 195 countries and territories, 1990-2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet Psychiatry. 2018;5(12):987–1012. 10.1016/S2215-0366(18)30337-7. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hall W, Stjepanović D, Caulkins J, Lynskey M, Leung J, Campbell G, et al. . Public health implications of legalising the production and sale of cannabis for medicinal and recreational use. Lancet. 2019;394(10208):1580–90. 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31789-1. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cruz JM, Boidi MF, Queirolo R. The status of support for cannabis regulation in Uruguay 4 years after reform: evidence from public opinion surveys. Drug Alcohol Rev. 2018;37(Suppl 1):S429–34. 10.1111/dar.12642. - DOI - PubMed