Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023;85(5):294-298.
doi: 10.1159/000530419. Epub 2023 May 11.

Custom Laser-Cut Silastic® Implants for Type I Thyroplasty in a Preclinical Model

Affiliations

Custom Laser-Cut Silastic® Implants for Type I Thyroplasty in a Preclinical Model

Azure Wilson et al. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec. 2023.

Abstract

This study aimed to produce customized silicone elastomer implants of varied size and shape for optimization of type I thyroplasty procedures in a rabbit model. Computer-aided design models of different implant designs were designed and used to program laser cutting of a medical-grade Silastic® sheet. Laser-cut implants were produced rapidly and cost-efficiently. Surgical implantation demonstrated vocal fold medialization and phonation in 5 test subjects. This technique may provide a low-cost alternative or adjunct method to hand-carving or commercial implants.

Keywords: Implant; Laser cut; Silastic; Thyroplasty.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.. Development and Implementation Laser-cut silicone elastomer implants.
a. CAD representation of implants created using Tinkercad to create 4 distinct implant shapes and sizes. S1D1 (light blue): rectangular 1 mm × 1 mm × 2 mm; S1D2 (dark blue): rectangular 1 mm × 2 mm × 2 mm; S2D1 (light yellow): tetrahedral 1 mm × 1 mm × 2 mm; S2D2 (dark yellow): tetrahedral 1 mm × 2 mm × 2 mm. An Epilog Zing 24 laser-cutting used parameters from these CAD models to create implants from medical-grade silicone elastomer non-reinforced sheeting. b. Calipers were used to confirm dimensions of laser-cut implants and compare with CAD models for accuracy. Specific example demonstrates accuracy of width in a S1D1 rectangular 1 × 1 × 2 mm implant. c. ex vivo MRI image in axial view of unilaterally implanted rabbit vocal fold with S1D1 rectangular 1 × 1 × 2 mm implant. d. in vivo laryngoscopic image of unilateral implanted rabbit vocal fold with S1D1 rectangular 1 × 1 × 2 mm implant.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.. Vocal fold medialization from implant using one sample as an example.
Model reconstructions in axial orientation with anterior at the bottom of the field and posterior at the top of the field. a-b. Reconstruction of the larynx at paramedian before implantation; c. Reconstruction of the vocal fold cover layer at paramedian before implantation; d-e. model reconstruction of the larynx after implantation; f. model reconstruction of the vocal fold cover layer after implantation; g. vocal fold cover comparisons before and after implantation; h. definitions of quantitative parameters to evaluate vocal fold adduction.

Similar articles

References

    1. Karlsen T, Sandvik L, Heimdal JH, Hjermstad MJ, Aarstad AK, Aarstad HJ. Health-related quality of life as studied by EORTC QLQ and Voice Handicap Index among various patients with laryngeal disease. J Voice. 2017. Mar;31(2):251 e17–e26. - PubMed
    1. Zuniga S, Ebersole B, Jamal N. Improved swallow outcomes after injection laryngoplasty in unilateral vocal fold immobility. Ear, Nose Throat J. 2018. 2018 Aug;97(8):250–6. - PubMed
    1. Crolley VE, Gibbins N. One hundred years of external approach medialisation thyroplasty. J Laryngol Otol. 2017. Mar;131(3):202–8. - PubMed
    1. Leder SB, Sasaki CT. Long-term changes in vocal quality following Isshiki thyroplasty type I. Laryngoscope. 1994. Mar;104(3):275–7. - PubMed
    1. Siu J, Tam S, Fung K. A comparison of outcomes in interventions for unilateral vocal fold paralysis: A systematic review. Laryngoscope. 2016. Jul;126(7):1616–24. - PubMed

Publication types