Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Oct;79(10):3727-3736.
doi: 10.1111/jan.15717. Epub 2023 May 26.

When nurses' vulnerability challenges their moral integrity: A discursive paper

Anna-Henrikje Seidlein  1 , Eva Kuhn  2
Affiliations
Review

When nurses' vulnerability challenges their moral integrity: A discursive paper

Anna-Henrikje Seidlein et al. J Adv Nurs. 2023 Oct.

Abstract

Background: Both vulnerability and integrity represent action-guiding concepts in nursing practice. However, they are primarily discussed regarding patients-not nurses-and considered independently from rather than in relation to each other.

Aim: The aim of this paper is to characterize the moral dimension of nurses' vulnerability and integrity, specify the concepts' relationship in nurses' clinical practice and, ultimately, allow a more fine-grained understanding.

Design: This discursive paper demonstrates how vulnerability and integrity relate to each other in nursing practice and carves out which types of vulnerability pose a threat to nurses' moral integrity. The concept of vulnerability developed by Mackenzie et al. (2014) is applied to the situation of nurses and expanded to include the concept of moral integrity according to Hardingham (2004). Four scenarios are used to demonstrate where and how nurses' vulnerabilities become particularly apparent in clinical practice. This leads to a cross-case discussion, in which the vulnerabilities identified are examined against the background of moral integrity and the relationship between the two concepts is determined in more detail.

Results and conclusion: Vulnerability and integrity do not only form a conceptual pair but also represent complementary moral concepts. Their joint consideration has both a theoretical and practical added value. It is shown that only specific forms of vulnerability pose a threat to moral integrity and the vulnerability-integrity relationship is mediated via moral distress.

Implications for the profession and/or patient care: The manuscript provides guidance on how the concrete threat(s) to integrity can be buffered and moral resilience can be promoted. Different types of threats also weigh differently and require specific approaches to assess and handle them at the micro-, meso- and macro-level of the healthcare system.

Keywords: decision-making; ethics; narrative; nurse-patient interaction; nurse-patient relationship; philosophy; self-care.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Angel, S., & Vatne, S. (2017). Vulnerability in patients and nurses and the mutual vulnerability in the patient-nurse relationship. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 26(9-10), 428-1437.
    1. Boldt, J. (2019). The concept of vulnerability in medical ethics and philosophy. Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine, 14(1), 6.
    1. Calhoun, C. (2016). Moral aims: Essays on the importance of getting it right and practicing morality with others (pp. 123-154). Oxford University Press.
    1. Carel, H. (2009). A reply to ‘towards an understanding of nursing as a response to human vulnerability’ by Derek Sellman: Vulnerability and illness. Nursing Philosophy, 10(3), 214-219.
    1. Daniel, L. E. (1998). Vulnerability as a key to authenticity. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 30(2), 191-192.

LinkOut - more resources