Herbicides Harm Key Orchard Predatory Mites
- PMID: 37233108
- PMCID: PMC10231069
- DOI: 10.3390/insects14050480
Herbicides Harm Key Orchard Predatory Mites
Abstract
The phytoseiid mites Galendromus occidentalis and Amblydromella caudiglans are critical for conservation biological control of pest mites in Washington State, U.S.A. apples. While the non-target effects of insecticides on phytoseiids are well described, research on herbicide effects is limited. Using laboratory bioassays, we examined lethal (female mortality) and sublethal (fecundity, egg hatch, larval survival) effects of seven herbicides and five adjuvants on A. caudiglans and G. occidentalis. The effects of mixing herbicides with recommended adjuvants were also tested to determine if the addition of an adjuvant increased herbicide toxicity. Glufosinate was the least selective herbicide tested, causing 100% mortality in both species. Paraquat caused 100% mortality in A. caudiglans and 56% mortality in G. occidentalis. Sublethal effects were significant for both species when exposed to oxyfluorfen. Adjuvants did not cause non-target effects in A. caudiglans. The non-ionic surfactant and methylated seed oil increased mortality and decreased reproduction in G. occidentalis. The high toxicity of glufosinate and paraquat for both predators is concerning; these are the primary "burn down" herbicide alternatives to glyphosate, which is decreasing in use due to consumer toxicity concerns. Field studies are needed to determine the extent to which herbicides disrupt orchard biological control, focusing on glufosinate, paraquat, and oxyfluorfen. Consumer preferences will need to be balanced with natural enemy conservation.
Keywords: Amblydromella caudiglans; Galendromus occidentalis; adjuvant; biological control; herbicides; integrated pest management; pesticide selectivity; phytoseiid.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.
Figures

References
-
- Putman W.L., Herne D.H.C. The role of predators and other biotic agents in regulationg the population density of phytophagous mites in Ontario peach orchards. Can. Entomol. 1966;98:808–820. doi: 10.4039/Ent98808-8. - DOI
-
- Clements D.R., Harmsen R. Prey preferences of adult and immature Zetzellia mali Ewing (Acari: Stigmaeidae) and Typhlodromus caudiglans Schuster (Acari: Phytoseiidae) Can. Entomol. 1993;125:967–969. doi: 10.4039/Ent125967-5. - DOI
-
- McMurtry J.A., de Moraes G.J., Famah Sourassou N. Revision of the lifestyles of phytoseiid mites (Acari: Phytoseiidae) and implications for biological control strategies. Syst. Appl. Acarol. 2013;18:297–320. doi: 10.11158/saa.18.4.1. - DOI
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources