Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 May 10;14(5):266.
doi: 10.3390/jfb14050266.

Wood as Possible Renewable Material for Bone Implants-Literature Review

Affiliations
Review

Wood as Possible Renewable Material for Bone Implants-Literature Review

Vadims Nefjodovs et al. J Funct Biomater. .

Abstract

Bone fractures and bone defects affect millions of people every year. Metal implants for bone fracture fixation and autologous bone for defect reconstruction are used extensively in treatment of these pathologies. Simultaneously, alternative, sustainable, and biocompatible materials are being researched to improve existing practice. Wood as a biomaterial for bone repair has not been considered until the last 50 years. Even nowadays there is not much research on solid wood as a biomaterial in bone implants. A few species of wood have been investigated. Different techniques of wood preparation have been proposed. Simple pre-treatments such as boiling in water or preheating of ash, birch and juniper woods have been used initially. Later researchers have tried using carbonized wood and wood derived cellulose scaffold. Manufacturing implants from carbonized wood and cellulose requires more extensive wood processing-heat above 800 °C and chemicals to extract cellulose. Carbonized wood and cellulose scaffolds can be combined with other materials, such as silicon carbide, hydroxyapatite, and bioactive glass to improve biocompatibility and mechanical durability. Throughout the publications wood implants have provided good biocompatibility and osteoconductivity thanks to wood's porous structure.

Keywords: biocomposites; bone repair; osteosynthesis; wood implants.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Schematical structure of bone and wood in macro, micro and nano scale.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Juniper implant in the in vivo model. 1—juniper implant; 2—bone tissue ingrowth.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Cellulose molecule.

References

    1. Borgel S., Latimer B., McDermott Y., Sarig R., Pokhojaev A., Abulafia T., Goder-Goldberger M., Barzilai O., May H. Early Upper Paleolithic human foot bones from Manot Cave, Israel. J. Hum. Evol. 2021;160:102668. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2019.102668. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Afshar A., Steensma D.P., Kyle R.A. Albin Lambotte: Pioneer of Osteosynthesis (Bone Fixation) Mayo Clin. Proc. 2021;96:2012–2013. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2021.05.010. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Roberts T.T., Prummer C.M., Papaliodis D.N., Uhl R.L., Wagner T.A. History of the orthopedic screw. Orthopedics. 2013;36:12–14. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20121217-02. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fairbank J. The Evolution of Orthopaedic Surgery, by Leslie Klenerman. Spine. 2002;27:2298. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200210150-00025. - DOI
    1. Steinbach L.W., IV On the Use of Fixation Plates in the Treatment of Fractures of the Leg. Ann. Surg. 1900;31:436–442. doi: 10.1097/00000658-190001000-00044. - DOI - PMC - PubMed