Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 May 5;11(5):433.
doi: 10.3390/toxics11050433.

Water Management Impacts on Chromium Behavior and Uptake by Rice in Paddy Soil with High Geological Background Values

Affiliations

Water Management Impacts on Chromium Behavior and Uptake by Rice in Paddy Soil with High Geological Background Values

Zeting Guan et al. Toxics. .

Abstract

Chromium (Cr) is an expression toxic metal and is seriously released into the soil environment due to its extensive use and mining. Basalt is an important Cr reservoir in the terrestrial environment. Cr in paddy soil can be enriched by chemical weathering. Therefore, basalt-derived paddy soils contain extremely high concentrations of Cr and can enter the human body through the food chain. However, the water management conditions' effect on the transformation of Cr in basalt-derived paddy soil with high geological background values was less recognized. In this study, a pot experiment was conducted to investigate the effects of different water management treatments on the migration and transformation of Cr in a soil-rice system at different rice growth stages. Two water management treatments of continuous flooding (CF) and alternative wet and dry (AWD) and four different rice growth stages were set up. The results showed that AWD treatment significantly reduced the biomass of rice and promoted the absorption of Cr in rice plants. During the four growth periods, the root, stem and leaf of rice increased from 11.24-16.11 mg kg-1, 0.66-1.56 mg kg-1 and 0.48-2.29 mg kg-1 to 12.43-22.60 mg kg-1, 0.98-3.31 mg kg-1 and 0.58-2.86 mg kg-1, respectively. The Cr concentration in roots, stems and leaves of AWD treatment was 40%, 89% and 25% higher than CF treatment in the filling stage, respectively. The AWD treatment also facilitated the potential bioactive fractions conversion to the bioavailable fraction, compared with the CF treatment. In addition, the enrichment of iron-reducing bacteria and sulfate-reducing bacteria with AWD treatment also provided electron iron for the mobilization of Cr, thus affecting the migration and transformation of Cr in the soil. We speculated that the reason for this phenomenon may be the bioavailability of Cr was affected by the biogeochemical cycle of iron under the influence of alternating redox. This indicates that AWD treatment may bring certain environmental risks in contaminated paddy soil with high geological background, and it is necessary to be aware of this risk when using water-saving irrigation to plant rice.

Keywords: chromium; high geological background; paddy soil; rice; water management.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Effects of different water managements on Cr concentrations in roots (a), stems (b) and leaves (c) of rice at different growth stages. The lowercase letters indicate the differences among the same treatment in different periods; the uppercase letters indicate the differences between different treatments in the same period, p < 0.05.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The concentration distribution of bioavailable fraction (F1+F2) (a), Fe/Mn oxide-bound fraction F3 (b), organic matter-bond fraction F4 (c), amorphous iron oxide fraction F5 (d), crystalline Fe oxide fraction F6 (e) and residual fraction F7 (f) of Cr in soil under different water management treatments at different growth stages. The lowercase letters indicate the differences among the same treatment in different periods; the uppercase letters indicate the differences between different treatments in the same period, p < 0.05.
Figure 3
Figure 3
The concentration distribution of different fractions of Fe in soil under different water management treatments at different growth stages of rice. The lowercase letters indicate the differences among the same treatment in different periods; the uppercase letters indicate the differences between different treatments in the same period, p < 0.05.
Figure 4
Figure 4
The relative community abundance of the top 10 soil bacteria on genus level in different treatments. T represents the Tillering stage; J represents the Jointing stage; B represents the Booting stage; F represents the Filling stage. CF refers to continuous flooding. AWD refers to alternate wet and dry irrigation.
Figure 5
Figure 5
The redundancy analysis (RDA) between bacterial community and related environmental variables of continuous flooding treatment (CF) (a) and alternative wet and dry treatment (AWD) (b) at genus level. TCr and TFe represent the Total Cr and the Total Fe, respectively; Cr-F1+F2 represent the bioavailable fractions of Cr; Cr-∑(F3–F6) represent potentially bioavailable fractions of Cr; Cr-F7 represents the residual fractions of Cr. (T represents the Tillering stage; J represents the Jointing stage; B represents the Booting stage; F represents the Filling stage.).
Figure 6
Figure 6
The spearman correlation on genus level between bacterial community and related environmental variables of continuous flooding treatment (CF) (a) and alternative wet and dry treatment (AWD) (b). TCr and TFe represent the Total Cr and the Total Fe, respectively; Cr-F1+F2 represent bioavailable fractions of Cr; Cr-∑(F3–F6) represent the potentially bioavailable fractions of Cr; Cr-F7 represents the residual fractions of Cr. (* means 0.01 ≤ p ≤ 0.05, ** means 0.001 ≤ p ≤ 0.01, and *** means p ≤ 0.001).

References

    1. He Z., Shen J., Ni Z., Tang J., Song S., Chen J., Zhao L. Electrochemically Created Roughened Lead Plate for Electrochemical Reduction of Aqueous CO2. Catal. Commun. 2015;72:38–42. doi: 10.1016/j.catcom.2015.08.024. - DOI
    1. Khalid S., Shahid M., Niazi N.K., Murtaza B., Bibi I., Dumat C. A Comparison of Technologies for Remediation of Heavy Metal Contaminated Soils. J. Geochem. Explor. 2017;182:247–268. doi: 10.1016/j.gexplo.2016.11.021. - DOI
    1. Coetzee J.J., Bansal N., Chirwa E.M.N. Chromium in Environment, Its Toxic Effect from Chromite-Mining and Ferrochrome Industries, and Its Possible Bioremediation. Expos. Health. 2020;12:51–62. doi: 10.1007/s12403-018-0284-z. - DOI
    1. Oze C., Fendorf S., Bird D.K., Coleman R.G. Chromium Geochemistry of Serpentine Soils. Int. Geol. Rev. 2004;46:97–126. doi: 10.2747/0020-6814.46.2.97. - DOI
    1. Becquer T., Quantin C., Rotte-Capet S., Ghanbaja J., Mustin C., Herbillon A.J. Sources of Trace Metals in Ferralsols in New Caledonia. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 2006;57:200–213. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2389.2005.00730.x. - DOI