Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jul;37(7):5696-5702.
doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10131-9. Epub 2023 May 26.

The environmental impact of surgical telemedicine: life cycle assessment of virtual vs. in-person preoperative evaluations for benign foregut disease

Affiliations

The environmental impact of surgical telemedicine: life cycle assessment of virtual vs. in-person preoperative evaluations for benign foregut disease

Rachel Sillcox et al. Surg Endosc. 2023 Jul.

Abstract

Background: Health care accounts for almost 10% of the United States' greenhouse gas emissions, accounting for a loss of 470,000 disability-adjusted life years based on the health effects of climate change. Telemedicine has the potential to decrease health care's carbon footprint by reducing patient travel and clinic-related emissions. At our institution, telemedicine visits for evaluation of benign foregut disease were implemented for patient care during the COVID-19 pandemic. We aimed to estimate the environmental impact of telemedicine usage for these clinic encounters.

Methods: We used life cycle assessment (LCA) to compare greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions for an in-person and a telemedicine visit. For in-person visits, travel distances to clinic were retrospectively assessed from 2020 visits as a representative sample, and prospective data were gathered on materials and processes related to in-person clinic visits. Prospective data on the length of telemedicine encounters were collected and environmental impact was calculated for equipment and internet usage. Upper and lower bounds scenarios for emissions were generated for each type of visit.

Results: For in-person visits, 145 patient travel distances were recorded with a median [IQR] distance travel distance of 29.5 [13.7, 85.1] miles resulting in 38.22-39.61 carbon dioxide equivalents (kgCO2-eq) emitted. For telemedicine visits, the mean (SD) visit time was 40.6 (17.1) min. Telemedicine GHG emissions ranged from 2.26 to 2.99 kgCO2-eq depending on the device used. An in-person visit resulted in 25 times more GHG emissions compared to a telemedicine visit (p < 0.001).

Conclusion: Telemedicine has the potential to decrease health care's carbon footprint. Policy changes to facilitate telemedicine use are needed, as well as increased awareness of potential disparities of and barriers to telemedicine use. Moving toward telemedicine preoperative evaluations in appropriate surgical populations is a purposeful step toward actively addressing our role in health care's large carbon footprint.

Keywords: Carbon footprint; Environmental impact; Foregut clinic; Telehealth; Telemedicine.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Drs. Sillcox, Meiklejohn, Wright, Oelschlager, Bryant, Tarefder and Zhu, Baraka Gitonga, and Zafrul Khan have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
GHG emissions across different telemedicine visit choices and in-person visit travel types. GHG = greenhouse gas, kgCO2-eq = carbon dioxide equivalents, AIO = all-in-one device

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Chung JW, Meltzer DO. Estimate of the carbon footprint of the US health care sector. JAMA. 2009;302(18):1970–1972. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.1610. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Eckelman MJ, Sherman J. Environmental impacts of the US health care system and effects on public health. PLoS ONE. 2016;11(6):e0157014. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0157014. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Malik A, et al. The carbon footprint of Australian health care. Lancet. 2018;2(1):e27–e35. doi: 10.1016/S2542-5196(17)30180-8. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Eckelman MJ, Sherman JD, MacNeill AJ. Life cycle environmental emissions and health damages from the Canadian healthcare system: an economic-environmental-epidemiological analysis. PLoS Med. 2018;15(7):e1002623. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002623. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Drew J, Christie SD, Tyedmers P, Smith-Forrester J, Rainham D. Operating in a climate crisis: a state-of-the-science review of life cycle assessment within surgical and anesthetic care. Environ Health Perspect. 2021;129(7):76001. doi: 10.1289/EHP8666. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Substances