Active control time: an objective performance metric for trainee participation in robotic surgery
- PMID: 37237112
- DOI: 10.1007/s11701-023-01628-5
Active control time: an objective performance metric for trainee participation in robotic surgery
Abstract
Trainee participation and progression in robotic general surgery remain poorly defined. Computer-assisted technology offers the potential to provide and track objective performance metrics. In this study, we aimed to validate the use of a novel metric-active control time (ACT)-for assessing trainee participation in robotic-assisted cases. Performance data from da Vinci Surgical Systems was retrospectively analyzed for all robotic cases involving trainees with a single minimally invasive surgeon over 10 months. The primary outcome metric was percent ACT-the amount of trainee console time spent in active system manipulations over total active time from both consoles. Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U statistical tests were applied in analyses. A total of 123 robotic cases with 18 general surgery residents and 1 fellow were included. Of these, 56 were categorized as complex. Median %ACT was statistically different between trainee levels for all case types taken in aggregate (PGY1s 3.0% [IQR 2-14%], PGY3s 32% [IQR 27-66%], PGY4s 42% [IQR 26-52%], PGY5s 50% [IQR 28-70%], and fellow 61% [IQR 41-85%], p = < 0.0001). When stratified by complexity, median %ACT was higher in standard versus complex cases for PGY5 (60% vs. 36%, p = 0.0002) and fellow groups (74% vs. 47%, p = 0.0045). In this study, we demonstrated an increase in %ACT with trainee level and with standard versus complex robotic cases. These findings are consistent with hypotheses, providing validity evidence for ACT as an objective measurement of trainee participation in robotic-assisted cases. Future studies will aim to define task-specific ACT to guide further robotic training and performance assessments.
Keywords: Automated performance metrics; Objective performance metrics; Robotic education; Robotic surgery; Robotic training.
© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature.
Similar articles
-
Use of targeted educational resources to improve robotic bariatric surgery training.Surg Endosc. 2024 Feb;38(2):894-901. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10436-9. Epub 2023 Oct 12. Surg Endosc. 2024. PMID: 37823946
-
Automated task-level autonomy assessment in robotic surgery.Surg Endosc. 2024 Oct;38(10):6033-6036. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11134-w. Epub 2024 Aug 7. Surg Endosc. 2024. PMID: 39110222
-
The robot doesn't lie: real-life validation of robotic performance metrics.Surg Endosc. 2023 Jul;37(7):5547-5552. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09707-8. Epub 2022 Oct 20. Surg Endosc. 2023. PMID: 36266482
-
Da Vinci© Skills Simulator™: is an early selection of talented console surgeons possible?J Robot Surg. 2016 Dec;10(4):289-296. doi: 10.1007/s11701-016-0616-6. Epub 2016 Jun 22. J Robot Surg. 2016. PMID: 27334771 Review.
-
Current practises and the future of robotic surgical training.Surgeon. 2023 Oct;21(5):314-322. doi: 10.1016/j.surge.2023.02.006. Epub 2023 Mar 15. Surgeon. 2023. PMID: 36932015 Review.
Cited by
-
Use of targeted educational resources to improve robotic bariatric surgery training.Surg Endosc. 2024 Feb;38(2):894-901. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10436-9. Epub 2023 Oct 12. Surg Endosc. 2024. PMID: 37823946
-
Is the robotic revolution stunting surgical skills?Surg Open Sci. 2024 Mar 27;19:63-65. doi: 10.1016/j.sopen.2024.03.009. eCollection 2024 Jun. Surg Open Sci. 2024. PMID: 38595831 Free PMC article.
-
Robotic performance metrics model fellow proficiency in living donor nephrectomy.J Robot Surg. 2024 Jun 27;18(1):271. doi: 10.1007/s11701-024-02032-3. J Robot Surg. 2024. PMID: 38937307
-
Automated task-level autonomy assessment in robotic surgery.Surg Endosc. 2024 Oct;38(10):6033-6036. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11134-w. Epub 2024 Aug 7. Surg Endosc. 2024. PMID: 39110222
-
Objective performance indicators during robotic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass distinguish experienced from trainee surgeons: a cross-sectional study.Surg Endosc. 2025 Aug;39(8):5178-5188. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-11873-4. Epub 2025 Jul 14. Surg Endosc. 2025. PMID: 40659951 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Sheetz KH, Claflin J, Dimick JB (2020) Trends in the adoption of robotic surgery for common surgical procedures. JAMA Netw Open. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.18911 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources