Pathogen detection in suspected spinal infection: metagenomic next-generation sequencing versus culture
- PMID: 37237239
- DOI: 10.1007/s00586-023-07707-3
Pathogen detection in suspected spinal infection: metagenomic next-generation sequencing versus culture
Abstract
Purpose: The aim is to compare the pathogen detection performance of metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) and the culturing of percutaneous needle biopsy samples obtained from an individual with a suspected spinal infection.
Methods: A retrospective study of 141 individuals with a suspected spinal infection was conducted, and mNGS was performed. The microbial spectra and detection performance between mNGS and the culturing-based method were compared, and the effects of antibiotic intervention and biopsy on the detection performance were assessed.
Results: The microorganisms isolated most commonly via the culturing-based method were Mycobacterium tuberculosis (n = 21), followed by Staphylococcus epidermidis (n = 13). The most common microorganisms detected via mNGS were Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTBC) (n = 39), followed by Staphylococcus aureus (n = 15). The difference in the type of detected microorganisms between culturing and mNGS was observed only in Mycobacterium (P = 0.001). mNGS helped identify potential pathogens in 80.9% of cases, which was significantly higher than the positivity rate of 59.6% observed for the culturing-based method (P < 0.001). Moreover, mNGS had a sensitivity of 85.7% (95% CI, 78.4% to 91.3%), a specificity of 86.7% (95% CI, 59.5% to 98.3%), and sensitivity gains of 35% (85.7% vs. 50.8%; P < 0.001) during culturing, while no differences were observed in the specificity (86.7% vs. 93.3%; P = 0.543). In addition, antibiotic interventions significantly lowered the positivity rate of the culturing-based method (66.0% vs. 45.5%, P = 0.021) but had no effects on the results of mNGS (82.5% vs. 77.3%, P = 0.467).
Conclusion: The use of mNGS could result in a higher detection rate compared to that observed with the culturing-based method in an individual with spinal infection and is particularly valuable for evaluating the effects of a mycobacterial infection or previous antibiotic intervention.
Keywords: Culture; Diagnosis; Metagenomic next-generation sequencing; Pathogen; Percutaneous needle biopsy; Spinal infection.
© 2023. The Author(s).
References
-
- Babic M, Simpfendorfer C (2017) Infections of the spine. Infect Dis Clin North Am 31:279–297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.idc.2017.01.003 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Luzzati R, Giacomazzi D, Danzi M, Tacconi L, Concia E, Vento S (2009) Diagnosis, management and outcome of clinically-suspected spinal infection. J Infect 58:259–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinf.2009.02.006 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Duarte R, Vaccaro A (2013) Spinal infection: state of the art and management algorithm. Eur spine J 22:2787–2799. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-013-2850-1 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Go JL, Rothman S, Prosper A, Silbergleit R, Lerner A (2012) Spine infections. Neuroimaging Clin N Am. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nic.2012.06.002 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Herren C, Jung N, Pishnamaz M, Breuninger M, Siewe J, Sobottke R (2017) Spondylodiscitis: diagnosis and treatment options a systematic review. Dtsch Arztebl Int. https://doi.org/10.3238/arztebl.2017.0875 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
