The feasibility of negative pressure wound therapy versus standard dressings in paediatric hand and foot burns protocol: a pilot, single-centre, randomised control trial
- PMID: 37237316
- PMCID: PMC10214590
- DOI: 10.1186/s40814-023-01308-z
The feasibility of negative pressure wound therapy versus standard dressings in paediatric hand and foot burns protocol: a pilot, single-centre, randomised control trial
Abstract
Introduction: The goal of paediatric hand and foot burn management is hypertrophic scar and/or contracture prevention. The risk of scar formation may be minimised by integrating negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) as an acute care adjunct as it decreases the time to re-epithelialisation. NPWT has known associated therapeutic burden; however, this burden is hypothesised to be outweighed by an increased likelihood of hypertrophic scar prevention. This study will assess the feasibility, acceptability and safety of NPWT in paediatric hand and foot burns with secondary outcomes of time to re-epithelialisation, pain, itch, cost and scar formation.
Methods and analysis: This is a single-site, pilot randomised control trial. Participants must be aged ≤ 16 years, otherwise well and managed within 24 h of sustaining either a hand or foot burn. Thirty participants will be randomised to either standard care (Mepitel®-a silicone wound interface contact dressing-and ACTICOAT™-a nanocrystalline silver-impregnated dressing) or standard care plus NPWT. Patients will be reviewed until 3 months post-burn wound re-epithelialisation, with measurements taken at dressing changes to assess primary and secondary outcomes. Surveys, randomisation and data storage will be done via online platforms and physical data storage collated at the Centre for Children's Health Research, Brisbane, Australia. Analysis will be performed using the Stata statistical software.
Ethics and dissemination: Queensland Health and Griffith University Human Research ethics approval including a site-specific assessment was obtained. The findings of this study will be disseminated through clinical meetings, conference presentations and peer reviewed journals.
Trial registration: Registered with the Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12622000044729, https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=381890&isReview=true , registered 17/01/2022).
Keywords: Burn; Feasibility and acceptability; Foot; Hand; Negative pressure wound therapy; Paediatric.
© 2023. Crown.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Protocol for a feasibility, acceptability and safety study of the PICO device (negative pressure wound therapy) in acute paediatric burns.BMJ Open. 2023 May 3;13(5):e068499. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-068499. BMJ Open. 2023. PMID: 37137557 Free PMC article.
-
Comparative effectiveness of Biobrane®, RECELL® Autologous skin Cell suspension and Silver dressings in partial thickness paediatric burns: BRACS randomised trial protocol.Burns Trauma. 2019 Oct 31;7:33. doi: 10.1186/s41038-019-0165-0. eCollection 2019. Burns Trauma. 2019. PMID: 31696127 Free PMC article.
-
Study of negative pressure wound therapy as an adjunct treatment for acute burns in children (SONATA in C): protocol for a randomised controlled trial.Trials. 2019 Feb 13;20(1):130. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3223-9. Trials. 2019. PMID: 30760332 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of three different dressings for partial thickness burns in children: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.Trials. 2013 Nov 25;14:403. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-14-403. Trials. 2013. PMID: 24274190 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
A retrospective review of burn dressings on a porcine burn model.Burns. 2010 Aug;36(5):680-7. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2009.06.200. Epub 2009 Oct 27. Burns. 2010. PMID: 19864074 Review.
Cited by
-
The efficacy and safety of negative pressure wound therapy in paediatric burns: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.BMC Pediatr. 2024 Dec 18;24(1):807. doi: 10.1186/s12887-024-05302-z. BMC Pediatr. 2024. PMID: 39696096 Free PMC article.
-
Protocol for a feasibility, acceptability and safety study of the PICO device (negative pressure wound therapy) in acute paediatric burns.BMJ Open. 2023 May 3;13(5):e068499. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-068499. BMJ Open. 2023. PMID: 37137557 Free PMC article.
-
Implementation of negative pressure for acute pediatric burns (INPREP): A stepped-wedge cluster randomized controlled trial protocol.PLoS One. 2024 Dec 10;19(12):e0315278. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0315278. eCollection 2024. PLoS One. 2024. PMID: 39656723 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Dargan D, Himmi G, Anwar U, Jivan S, Muthayya P. A comparison of the epidemiology of isolated and non-isolated hand burns. Burns. 2022;49(4):951-960. - PubMed
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials