The Implementation of FDG PET/CT for Staging Bladder Cancer: Changes in the Detection and Characteristics of Occult Nodal Metastases at Upfront Radical Cystectomy?
- PMID: 37240473
- PMCID: PMC10218880
- DOI: 10.3390/jcm12103367
The Implementation of FDG PET/CT for Staging Bladder Cancer: Changes in the Detection and Characteristics of Occult Nodal Metastases at Upfront Radical Cystectomy?
Abstract
Occult lymph node (LN)-metastases are frequently found after upfront radical cystectomy (uRC) for bladder cancer (BC). We evaluated whether the implementation of 18F-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG PET/CT) influenced nodal staging at uRC. All consecutive BC patients who underwent uRC with bilateral pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) were identified and divided into two cohorts: cohort A consisted of patients staged with FDG PET/CT and contrast-enhanced CT (CE-CT) (2016-2021); cohort B consisted of patients staged with CE-CT only (2006-2011). The diagnostic performance of FDG PET/CT was assessed and compared with that of CE-CT. Thereafter, we calculated the occult LN metastases proportions for both cohorts. In total, 523 patients were identified (cohort A n = 237, and cohort B n = 286). Sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of FDG PET/CT for detecting LN metastases were 23%, 92%, 42%, and 83%, respectively, versus 15%, 93%, 33%, 81%, respectively, for CE-CT. Occult LN metastases were found in 17% of cohort A (95% confidence interval (CI) 12.2-22.8) and 22% of cohort B (95% CI 16.9-27.1). The median size of LN metastases was 4 mm in cohort A versus 13 mm in cohort B. After introduction of FDG PET/CT, fewer and smaller occult LN metastases were present after uRC. Nevertheless, up to one-fifth of occult (micro-)metastases were still missed.
Keywords: CT; FDG PET/CT; bladder cancer; imaging; lymph node; metastasis; neoadjuvant chemotherapy; radical cystectomy; staging; urothelial carcinoma.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Figures

References
-
- Witjes J.A., Bruins H.M., Cathomas R., Compérat E.M., Cowan N.C., Gakis G., Hernández V., Linares Espinós E., Lorch A., Neuzillet Y., et al. European Association of Urology Guidelines on Muscle-invasive and Metastatic Bladder Cancer: Summary of the 2020 Guidelines. Eur. Urol. 2021;79:82–104. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.03.055. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Galsky M.D., Stensland K., Sfakianos J.P., Mehrazin R., Diefenbach M., Mohamed N., Tsao C.K., Boffetta P., Wiklund P., Oh W.K., et al. Comparative effectiveness of treatment strategies for bladder cancer with clinical evidence of regional lymph node involvement. J. Clin. Oncol. 2016;34:2627–2635. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.67.5033. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Stein J.P., Lieskovsky G., Cote R., Groshen S., Feng A.C., Boyd S., Skinner E., Bochner B., Thangathurai D., Mikhail M., et al. Radical cystectomy in the treatment of invasive bladder cancer: Long-term results in 1054 patients. J. Clin. Oncol. 2001;19:666–675. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2001.19.3.666. - DOI - PubMed