Regional Citrate Anticoagulation in Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy: Is Metabolic Fear the Enemy of Logic? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials
- PMID: 37240843
- PMCID: PMC10221969
- DOI: 10.3390/life13051198
Regional Citrate Anticoagulation in Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy: Is Metabolic Fear the Enemy of Logic? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials
Abstract
Background: Anticoagulation is recommended to maintain the patency of the circuit in continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT). However, anticoagulation-associated complications can occur. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the efficacy and safety of citrate anticoagulation to heparin anticoagulation in critically ill patients treated with CRRT.
Methods: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the safety and efficacy of citrate anticoagulation and heparin in CRRT were included. Articles not describing the incidence of metabolic and/or electrolyte disturbances induced by the anticoagulation strategy were excluded. The PubMed, Embase, and MEDLINE electronic databases were searched. The last search was performed on 18 February 2022.
Results: Twelve articles comprising 1592 patients met the inclusion criteria. There was no significant difference between the groups in the development of metabolic alkalosis (RR = 1.46; (95% CI (0.52-4.11); p = 0.470)) or metabolic acidosis (RR = 1.71, (95% CI (0.99-2.93); p = 0.054)). Patients in the citrate group developed hypocalcaemia more frequently (RR = 3.81; 95% CI (1.67-8.66); p = 0.001). Bleeding complications in patients randomised to the citrate group were significantly lower than those in the heparin group (RR 0.32 (95% CI (0.22-0.47); p < 0.0001)). Citrate showed a significantly longer filter lifespan of 14.52 h (95% CI (7.22-21.83); p < 0.0001), compared to heparin. There was no significant difference between the groups for 28-day mortality (RR = 1.08 (95% CI (0.89-1.31); p = 0.424) or 90-day mortality (RR 0.9 (95% CI (0.8-1.02); p = 0.110).
Conclusion: regional citrate anticoagulation is a safe anticoagulant for critically ill patients who require CRRT, as no significant differences were found in metabolic complications between the groups. Additionally, citrate has a lower risk of bleeding and circuit loss than heparin.
Keywords: anticoagulation; citrate; continuous renal replacement therapy; filter lifespan; heparin; metabolic complications.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Figures
References
-
- Ostermann M., Bellomo R., Burdmann E.A., Doi K., Endre Z.H., Goldstein S.L., Kane-Gill S.L., Liu K.D., Prowle J.R., Shaw A.D., et al. Controversies in acute kidney injury: Conclusions from a Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Conference. Kidney Int. 2020;98:294–309. doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2020.04.020. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Fiaccadori E., Pistolesi V., Mariano F., Mancini E., Canepari G., Inguaggiato P., Pozzato M., Morabito S. Regional citrate anticoagulation for renal replacement therapies in patients with acute kidney injury: A position statement of the Work Group “Renal Replacement Therapies in Critically Ill Patients” of the Italian Society of Nephrology. J. Nephrol. 2015;28:151–164. doi: 10.1007/s40620-014-0160-2. - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
