Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 May 9;14(5):1019.
doi: 10.3390/mi14051019.

Biaxial Piezoelectric MEMS Mirrors with Low Absorption Coating for 1550 nm Long-Range LIDAR

Affiliations

Biaxial Piezoelectric MEMS Mirrors with Low Absorption Coating for 1550 nm Long-Range LIDAR

L Mollard et al. Micromachines (Basel). .

Abstract

This paper presents the fabrication and characterization of a biaxial MEMS (MicroElectroMechanical System) scanner based on PZT (Lead Zirconate Titanate) which incorporates a low-absorption dielectric multilayer coating, i.e., a Bragg reflector. These 2 mm square MEMS mirrors, developed on 8-inch silicon wafers using VLSI (Very Large Scale Integration) technology are intended for long-range (>100 m) LIDAR (LIght Detection And Ranging) applications using a 2 W (average power) pulsed laser at 1550 nm. For this laser power, the use of a standard metal reflector leads to damaging overheating. To solve this problem, we have developed and optimised a physical sputtering (PVD) Bragg reflector deposition process compatible with our sol-gel piezoelectric motor. Experimental absorption measurements, performed at 1550 nm and show up to 24 times lower incident power absorption than the best metallic reflective coating (Au). Furthermore, we validated that the characteristics of the PZT, as well as the performance of the Bragg mirrors in terms of optical scanning angles, were identical to those of the Au reflector. These results open up the possibility of increasing the laser power beyond 2W for LIDAR applications or other applications requiring high optical power. Finally, a packaged 2D scanner was integrated into a LIDAR system and three-dimensional point cloud images were obtained, demonstrating the scanning stability and operability of these 2D MEMS mirrors.

Keywords: 2D MEMS mirror; Bragg reflector; high power management; piezoelectric; quasi-static actuator.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Modal analysis of the mirror: (a) First resonance mode (1.51 kHz-pumping mode); second (b) and third (c) resonance modes (2.179 and 2.18 kHz–X/Y-rotational modes)–Design variant 1.
Figure 2
Figure 2
MEMS mirror top view.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Evolution of absorption (%) (a) and reflectivity (%) (b) of PVD Bragg bilayer mirror vs the number of Bragg bilayer–comparison with gold reflective layer.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Magnitude/optical angle (▲) and Phase shift (●) for the first (Vpp = 3 V) (a) and second and third (Vpp = 4 V) (b) resonant modes–design variant 1.
Figure 5
Figure 5
2D scanning representation of MEMS mirror with Bragg (n = 2) reflector-50 point per fast axis period–(a) Design variant 1:25 V voltage-600Hz fast/horizontal axis and 10 Hz ramp slow/vertical axis–(b) Design variant 3:20 V Voltage–200 Hz fast/Horizontal axis and 4 Hz ramp slow/vertical axis.
Figure 6
Figure 6
2D scanning representation of MEMS mirror with Bragg (n = 2) reflector-50 point per fast axis period–20 V voltage-200 Hz fast/horizontal axis and 4 Hz ramp slow/vertical axis-(a) Design variant 4; (b) Design variant 5.
Figure 7
Figure 7
FoM values previously reported in [3] (▲) and this work (formula image Bragg (n = 2) and formula image Gold reflector).
Figure 8
Figure 8
(a) Mirror packaging and (b) integration of the MEMS scanner inside Biaxial LIDAR system (Right).
Figure 9
Figure 9
(a) View of the scene, (b) reflected laser intensity at 1064 nm and (c) depth value image.
Figure 10
Figure 10
3D representation of the scene, Point Clouds.

References

    1. Holmström S.T.S., Baran U., Urey H. MEMS Laser scanners: A Review. [(accessed on 21 March 2023)];J. Microelectromech. Syst. 2014 23:259–275. doi: 10.1109/JMEMS.2013.2295470. Available online: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6714402. - DOI
    1. Song Y., Panas R.M., Hopkins J.B. A review of micromirror arrays. Precis. Eng. 2018;51:729–761. doi: 10.1016/j.precisioneng.2017.08.012. - DOI
    1. Wang D., Watkins C., Xie H. MEMS mirrors for LIDAR: A review. Micromachines. 2020;11:456. doi: 10.3390/mi11050456. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kasturi A., Milanovic V., Lovell D., Hu F., Ho D., Su Y., Ristic L. Comparison of MEMS Mirror LIDAR Architectures; Proceedings of the MOEMS and Miniaturized Systems XIX Conference; San Francisco, CA, USA. 1–6 February 2020; - DOI
    1. Boni M., Carminati R., Mendicino G., Merli M. Quasi-static PZT actuated MEMS mirror with 4X3mm2 reflective area and high robustness; Proceedings of the MOEMS and Miniaturized Systems XX Conference; Online. 6–12 March 2021; - DOI

LinkOut - more resources