Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 May 12;16(5):735.
doi: 10.3390/ph16050735.

Design, Synthesis, and Evaluation of Niclosamide Analogs as Therapeutic Agents for Enzalutamide-Resistant Prostate Cancer

Affiliations

Design, Synthesis, and Evaluation of Niclosamide Analogs as Therapeutic Agents for Enzalutamide-Resistant Prostate Cancer

Borui Kang et al. Pharmaceuticals (Basel). .

Abstract

Niclosamide effectively downregulates androgen receptor variants (AR-Vs) for treating enzalutamide and abiraterone-resistant prostate cancer. However, the poor pharmaceutical properties of niclosamide due to its solubility and metabolic instability have limited its clinical utility as a systemic treatment for cancer. A novel series of niclosamide analogs was prepared to systematically explore the structure-activity relationship and identify active AR-Vs inhibitors with improved pharmaceutical properties based on the backbone chemical structure of niclosamide. Compounds were characterized using 1H NMR, 13C NMR, MS, and elemental analysis. The synthesized compounds were evaluated for antiproliferative activity and downregulation of AR and AR-V7 in two enzalutamide-resistant cell lines, LNCaP95 and 22RV1. Several of the niclosamide analogs exhibited equivalent or improved anti-proliferation effects in LNCaP95 and 22RV1 cell lines (B9, IC50 LNCaP95 and 22RV1 = 0.130 and 0.0997 μM, respectively), potent AR-V7 down-regulating activity, and improved metabolic stability. In addition, both a traditional structure-activity relationship (SAR) and 3D-QSAR analysis were performed to guide further structural optimization. The presence of two -CF3 groups of the most active B9 in the sterically favorable field and the presence of the -CN group of the least active B7 in the sterically unfavorable field seem to make B9 more potent than B7 in the antiproliferative activity.

Keywords: androgen receptor variant 7 (AR-V7) down-regulators; enzalutamide-resistant prostate cancer; niclosamide analogs; structure–activity relationship (SAR).

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Niclosamide and other non-nonsteroidal AR competitive inhibitors.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Design of compounds (AC).
Scheme 1
Scheme 1
Synthesis route of compounds A1A20, B1, B3B16 and C1C5. Reactants and reaction conditions: (a) thionyl chloride, DMF (cat.), anhydrous THF, 0 °C- r.t.; (b) substituted anilines, DMAP (cat.), anhydrous THF, and 0 °C- r.t.
Scheme 2
Scheme 2
Synthesis of compound B2. Reactants and reaction conditions: (a) reduced iron powder, HCl (aq.), and MeOH/EtOH (1/2, v/v).
Scheme 3
Scheme 3
Synthesis of compound C6C8. Reactants and reaction conditions: (a) acetic anhydride or trifluoromethanesulfonic anhydride, pyridine, anhydrous DCM, and 0 °C- r.t.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Downregulation of AR and AR–V7 expression in LNCaP95 cells by niclosamide and B1.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Downregulation of AR and AR–V7 expression in 22RV1 cells by niclosamide and compound B1.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Downregulation of AR and AR–V7 expression in LNCaP95 and 22RV1 cells by niclosamide, compounds B3, B9, and B14.
Figure 6
Figure 6
SAR study on niclosamide analogs.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Actual vs. predicted activities for the training (blue squares) and test (red triangles) set compounds obtained from the field-based QSAR. The residual line limits of ±0.35 are shown by dotted-dash lines.
Figure 8
Figure 8
Contour mapping of the filed-based QSAR for the most active (B9) and least active (B7) compounds in 22RV1. (a) Steric: green (favored) and yellow (unfavored), (b) electrostatic: blue (+) and red (−), (c) hydrophobic: yellow (favored) and white (unfavored), (d) H-bond donor: blue-violet (favored) and cyan (unfavored), and (e) H-bond acceptor: red (favored) and magenta (unfavored).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bray F., Ferlay J., Soerjomataram I., Siegel R.L., Torre L.A., Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2018;68:394–424. doi: 10.3322/caac.21492. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Attard G., Richards J., de Bono J.S. New Strategies in Metastatic Prostate Cancer: Targeting the Androgen Receptor Signaling Pathway. Clin. Cancer Res. 2011;17:1649–1657. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-10-0567. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Carver B.S. Strategies for targeting the androgen receptor axis in prostate cancer. Drug Discov. Today. 2014;19:1493–1497. doi: 10.1016/j.drudis.2014.07.008. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hoang D.T., Iczkowski K.A., Kilari D., See W., Nevalainen M.T. Androgen receptor-dependent and -independent mechanisms driving prostate cancer progression: Opportunities for therapeutic targeting from multiple angles. Oncotarget. 2017;8:3724–3745. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.12554. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lieberman R. Androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer chemoprevention: Current status and future directions for agent development. Urology. 2001;58((Suppl. S1)):83–90. doi: 10.1016/S0090-4295(01)01247-X. - DOI - PubMed