Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 May 17;11(5):995.
doi: 10.3390/vaccines11050995.

Evaluation of IL-35, as a Possible Biomarker for Follow-Up after Therapy, in Chronic Human Schistosoma Infection

Affiliations

Evaluation of IL-35, as a Possible Biomarker for Follow-Up after Therapy, in Chronic Human Schistosoma Infection

Nadia Marascio et al. Vaccines (Basel). .

Abstract

The host response to helminth infections is characterized by systemic and tissue-related immune responses that play a crucial role in pathological diseases. Recently, experimental studies have highlighted the role of regulatory T (Tregs) and B (Bregs) cells with secreted cytokines as important markers in anti-schistosomiasis immunity. We investigated the serical levels of five cytokines (TNFα, IFN-γ, IL-4, IL-10 and IL-35) in pre- and post-treatment samples from chronic Schistosoma infected patients to identify potential serological markers during follow-up therapy. Interestingly, we highlighted an increased serum level of IL-35 in the pre-therapy samples (median 439 pg/mL for Schistosoma haematobium and 100.5 pg/mL for Schistsoma mansoni infected patients) compared to a control group (median 62 pg/mL and 58 pg/mL, respectively, p ≤ 0.05), and a significantly lower concentration in post-therapy samples (181 pg/mL for S. haematobium and 49.5 pg/mL for S. mansoni infected patients, p ≤ 0.05). The present study suggests the possible role of IL-35 as a novel serological biomarker in the evaluation of Schistosoma therapy follow-up.

Keywords: IL-35; Schistosoma haematobium; Schistosoma mansoni.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Cytokine concentrations in serum samples from pre-therapy (Pre-therapy SH) and post-therapy (Post-therapy SH) Schistosoma haematobium (SH) patients (n = 15) vs. healthy controls (CON Neg) (n = 9). Values are expressed as median and quartile ranges; significant differences were evaluated by the Kruskal–Wallis test plus Dunn’s test. (A) TNFα. * p ≤ 0.05 post-therapy vs. CON Neg; (B) IFNγ. * p ≤ 0.05 pre- and post-therapy vs. CON Neg; (C) IL-4. * p ≤ 0.05 post-therapy vs. CON Neg; (D) IL-10. * p ≤ 0.05 pre- and post-therapy vs. CON Neg.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Cytokine concentrations in serum samples from pre-therapy (Pre-therapy SM) and post-therapy (Post-therapy SM) Schistosoma mansoni (SM) patients (mono- and co-infected) (n = 16) vs. healthy controls (CON Neg) (n = 9). Values are expressed as median and quartile ranges; significant differences were evaluated by the Kruskal–Wallis test plus Dunn’s test. (A) TNFα. * p ≤ 0.05 pre-therapy vs. healthy control (mono- and co-infected); (B) IFN-γ. * p ≤ 0.05 pre-therapy vs. control and § p ≤ 0.05 post therapy vs. pre-therapy (mono-infected only); (C) IL-4. No significant differences found; (D) IL-10. * p ≤ 0.05 pre-therapy vs. control and § p ≤ 0.05 post-therapy vs. pre-therapy.
Figure 3
Figure 3
IL-35 cytokine concentrations in serum samples from Schistosoma haematobium (SH) (n = 15) and Schistosoma mansoni (SM) mono- and co-infected patients (n = 16) and healthy controls (CON neg) (n = 9) pre- and post-therapy. Values are expressed as median and quartile ranges; significant differences were evaluated by the Kruskal–Wallis test plus Dunn’s test. (A) * p ≤ 0.05 pre-therapy vs. control and § p ≤ 0.05 post-therapy v pre-therapy; (B) * p ≤ 0.05 pre-therapy vs. control (mono- and co-infected) and § p ≤ 0.05 post therapy vs. pre-therapy (mono- and co-infected).

References

    1. Boon N.A.M., Fannes W., Rombouts S., Polman K., Volckaert F.A.M., Huyse T. Detecting hybridization in African Schistosoma species: Does egg morphology complement molecular species identification? Parasitology. 2017;144:954–964. doi: 10.1017/S0031182017000087. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Verjee M.A. Schistosomiasis: Still a Cause of Significant Morbidity and Mortality. Res. Rep. Trop. Med. 2019;10:153–163. doi: 10.2147/RRTM.S204345. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Carbonell C., Rodríguez-Alonso B., López-Bernús A., Almeida H., Galindo-Pérez I., Velasco-Tirado V., Marcos M., Pardo-Lledías J., Belhassen-García M. Clinical Spectrum of Schistosomiasis: An Update. J. Clin. Med. 2021;10:5521. doi: 10.3390/jcm10235521. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mazzitelli M., Torti C., Greco G., Strazzulla A., Costa C., Pisani V., Sorace C., Giancotti A., Lamberti A., Barreca G.S., et al. Prevalence of parasitic infections in migrants: Do official symptom-driven guidelines apply to the current situation? Infez. Med. 2018;26:347–355. - PubMed
    1. Webster B.L., Diaw O.T., Seye M.M., Webster J.P., Rollinson D. Introgressive hybridization of Schistosoma haematobium group species in Senegal: Species barriers break down between ruminant and human schistosomes. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2013;7:e2110. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0002110. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources