Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 May 11;15(5):1155.
doi: 10.3390/v15051155.

In Vitro Antiviral Activity of Nordihydroguaiaretic Acid against SARS-CoV-2

Affiliations

In Vitro Antiviral Activity of Nordihydroguaiaretic Acid against SARS-CoV-2

Erendira Villalobos-Sánchez et al. Viruses. .

Abstract

The coronavirus infectious disease 2019 (COVID-19) is caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and has been spreading rapidly worldwide, creating a pandemic. This article describes the evaluation of the antiviral activity of nordihydroguaiaretic acid (NDGA), a molecule found in Creosote bush (Larrea tridentata) leaves, against SARS-CoV-2 in vitro. A 35 µM concentration of NDGA was not toxic to Vero cells and exhibited a remarkable inhibitory effect on the SARS-CoV-2 cytopathic effect, viral plaque formation, RNA replication, and expression of the SARS-CoV-2 spike glycoprotein. The 50% effective concentration for NDGA was as low as 16.97 µM. Our results show that NDGA could be a promising therapeutic candidate against SARS-CoV-2.

Keywords: Larrea tridentata; NDGA; SARS-CoV-2 antivirals.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Cytotoxicity of nordihydroguaiaretic acid in Vero cells. (A) Chemical structure of NDGA; (B) Cell viability of Vero cells treated with NDGA (≥90% purity) after 48 h treatment, using the MTT assay. Each value represents the mean of two experiments with four replicates ± standard deviation (SD). CC50 value was determined using non-linear regression with GraphPad Prism 8, and the blue line represents the tendency line of analysis.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Inverted microscopic representative photographs of cell cultures at 96 h post-infection. Vero CCL-81 cells were infected with 100 TCID50/mL of SARS-CoV-2 and treated with two NDGA concentrations. (A) Negative control (untreated Vero cells); (B) SARS-CoV-2 positive control presenting CPE (black arrow: cell rounding; yellow arrow: detachment); (C) Infected Vero cells treated with NDGA 35 µM; (D) Infected Vero cells treated with NDGA 50 µM. (E) Dose–response curve analyses were performed against 100 TCID50 viral concentrations. Cytopathic effect reduction was expressed as the percent protection from CPE (no CPE appearance in replicates n = 8) in two experiments. The EC50 value was determined using non-linear regression with GraphPad Prism 8, and the blue line represents the tendency line of analysis.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Antiviral activity of NDGA against SARS-CoV-2 by viral plaque reduction assay at 96 h post-infection. (A) Simultaneous infection assay with 35 µM NDGA, plus 100 TCID50/mL of SARS-CoV-2; (B) Diagram of the time of drug assay; (C) Time of addition analysis of NDGA against 250 TCID50/mL of SARS-CoV-2 infection. The experiments were carried out in quadruplicate, and the percentage of reduction is represented as the mean ± S.D. * p ≤ 0.05, as compared with control; (D) Western blot analysis. SARS-CoV-2 spike protein was detected in the positive control but not with 35 µM of NDGA treatment. Bio-Rad Precision Plus Standards were loaded in line 1.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Quantification of viral genome replication in cell culture. Vero cells were treated with NDGA 35 µM and infected simultaneously with 100 TCID50/mL of each SARS-CoV-2 variant, for 96 h. as described in Section 2.6. All assays were performed in triplicate. Viral RNA from positive control (untreated) supernatants or treated cultures were measured by real-time RT-qPCR. The student t-test was performed, and data is reported as mean values ± SD (**** p < 0.001).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Zhu N., Zhang D., Wang W., Li X., Yang B., Song J., Zhao X., Huang B., Shi W., Lu R. A novel coronavirus from patients with pneumonia in China, 2019. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020;382:727–733. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2001017. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ye Z.-W., Yuan S., Yuen K.-S., Fung S.-Y., Chan C.-P., Jin D.-Y. Zoonotic origins of human coronaviruses. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 2020;16:1686. doi: 10.7150/ijbs.45472. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Çalıca Utku A., Budak G., Karabay O., Güçlü E., Okan H.D., Vatan A. Main symptoms in patients presenting in the COVID-19 period. Scott. Med. J. 2020;65:127–132. doi: 10.1177/0036933020949253. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Malik Y.A. Properties of coronavirus and SARS-CoV-2. Malays. J. Pathol. 2020;42:3–11. - PubMed
    1. Jackson C.B., Farzan M., Chen B., Choe H. Mechanisms of SARS-CoV-2 entry into cells. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2022;23:3–20. doi: 10.1038/s41580-021-00418-x. - DOI - PMC - PubMed