Development of the Online Problem Gaming Behavior Index: A New Scale Based on Actual Problem Gambling Behavior Rather Than the Consequences of it
- PMID: 37243668
- PMCID: PMC10858630
- DOI: 10.1177/01632787231179460
Development of the Online Problem Gaming Behavior Index: A New Scale Based on Actual Problem Gambling Behavior Rather Than the Consequences of it
Abstract
Many items in current problem gambling screens focus on negative consequences of gambling and gambling-related harms. However, few problem gambling screens comprise items that are totally based on actual gambling behavior such as gambling duration, gambling frequency, or gambling late at night. The aim of the present study was to develop and validate the 12-item Online Problem Gambling Behavior Index (OPGBI). A total of 10,000 online Croatian gamblers were administered the OPGBI alongside the nine-item Problem Gambling Severity Index (PGSI), as well as questions regarding types of gambling engaged in and socio-demographic factors. The 12 OPGBI items mainly concern actual gambling behavior. The correlation between OPGBI and PGSI was highly significant (r = 0.68). Three latent factors in the OPGBI were identified (gambling behavior, limit setting, communication with operator). The three factors all significantly correlated with the PGSI score (R2- = 51.8%). The fact that pure gambling behavior related items explained over 50% of the PGSI score strengthens the idea that player tracking could be an important approach in identifying problem gambling.
Keywords: Gambling screens; Online Problem Gambling Behavior Index; Online gambling; Problem Gambling Severity Index; Problem gambling.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: The fourth author’s university has received funding from
Similar articles
-
Exploring the association between loot boxes and problem gambling: Are video gamers referring to loot boxes when they complete gambling screening tools?Addict Behav. 2022 Aug;131:107318. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2022.107318. Epub 2022 Mar 29. Addict Behav. 2022. PMID: 35381433
-
Using artificial intelligence algorithms to predict self-reported problem gambling with account-based player data in an online casino setting.J Gambl Stud. 2023 Sep;39(3):1273-1294. doi: 10.1007/s10899-022-10139-1. Epub 2022 Jul 19. J Gambl Stud. 2023. PMID: 35852779 Free PMC article.
-
Enhancing the utility of the problem gambling severity index in clinical settings: Identifying refined categories within the problem gambling category.Addict Behav. 2020 Apr;103:106257. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2019.106257. Epub 2019 Dec 18. Addict Behav. 2020. PMID: 31884377
-
Loot boxes use, video gaming, and gambling in adolescents: Results from a path analysis before and during COVID-19-pandemic-related lockdown in Italy.Front Psychol. 2022 Sep 27;13:1009129. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1009129. eCollection 2022. Front Psychol. 2022. PMID: 36237679 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Conduct problems and depressive symptoms in association with problem gambling and gaming: A systematic review.J Behav Addict. 2020 Jul 23;9(3):497-533. doi: 10.1556/2006.2020.00045. Print 2020 Oct 12. J Behav Addict. 2020. PMID: 32750033 Free PMC article.
References
-
- American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). American Psychiatric Publishing.
-
- Auer M., Griffiths M. D. (2016). Should voluntary “self-exclusion” by gamblers be used as a proxy measure for problem gambling? MOJ Addiction Medicine & Therapy, 2(2), 00019. 10.15406/mojamt.2016.02.00019 - DOI
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical