Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 May;17(5):e13151.
doi: 10.1111/irv.13151.

Risk factors for infection with influenza A(H3N2) virus on a US university campus, October-November 2021

Affiliations

Risk factors for infection with influenza A(H3N2) virus on a US university campus, October-November 2021

Nathaniel M Lewis et al. Influenza Other Respir Viruses. 2023 May.

Abstract

Background: Knowledge of the specific dynamics of influenza introduction and spread in university settings is limited.

Methods: Persons with acute respiratory illness symptoms received influenza testing by molecular assay during October 6-November 23, 2022. Viral sequencing and phylogenetic analysis were conducted on nasal swab samples from case-patients. Case-control analysis of a voluntary survey of persons tested was used to identify factors associated with influenza; logistic regression was conducted to calculate odds ratios and 95% CIs. A subset of case-patients tested during the first month of the outbreak was interviewed to identify sources of introduction and early spread.

Results: Among 3268 persons tested, 788 (24.1%) tested positive for influenza; 744 (22.8%) were included in the survey analysis. All 380 sequenced specimens were influenza A (H3N2) virus clade 3C.2a1b.2a.2, suggesting rapid transmission. Influenza (OR [95% CI]) was associated with indoor congregate dining (1.43 [1.002-2.03]), attending large gatherings indoors (1.83 [1.26-2.66]) or outdoors (2.33 [1.64-3.31]), and varied by residence type (apartment with ≥1 roommate: 2.93 [1.21-7.11], residence hall room alone: 4.18 [1.31-13.31], or with roommate: 6.09 [2.46-15.06], or fraternity/sorority house: 15.13 [4.30-53.21], all compared with single-dwelling apartment). Odds of influenza were lower among persons who left campus for ≥1 day during the week before their influenza test (0.49 [0.32-0.75]). Almost all early cases reported attending large events.

Conclusions: Congregate living and activity settings on university campuses can lead to rapid spread of influenza following introduction. Isolating following a positive influenza test or administering antiviral medications to exposed persons may help mitigate outbreaks.

Keywords: congregate settings; influenza; respiratory infections; respiratory viruses; risk factors; student health.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Emily T. Martin reports grants from NIH and Merck and payment for lectures from the Michigan Infectious Diseases Society, unrelated to the submitted work. Adam S. Lauring reports grants from the US CDC, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, and Burroughs Wellcome Fund; consulting fees from Sanofi and Roche; and membership on the American Society of Virology governing council (unpaid), unrelated to the submitted work.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Number of persons tested for influenza A at University Health Services and percent influenza A positivity, by date of influenza test (N = 3268 tested)—University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA, October 6–November 23, 2021. University Health Services does not conduct influenza A testing on Sundays. For persons tested more than once during October 6–November 23, 2021, the first influenza A positive test result was used, or if the individual never tested positive for influenza A, the first negative test was used.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
(A) Phylogenetic tree of human influenza whole genome sequences inferred using IQ‐TREE. Squares are collapsed outbreak samples with identical genotypes. (B) Regression from TreeTime showing the relationship between distance from the root and sampling time. The regression was used to calculate the molecular clock and the time to most recent common ancestor.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Van D, McLaws ML, Crimmins J, et al. University life and pandemic influenza: attitudes and intended behaviour of staff and students towards pandemic (H1N1) 2009. BMC Public Health. 2010;10(1):130. doi:10.1186/1471-2458-10-130 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kak V. Infections in confined spaces: cruise ships, military barracks, and college dormitories. Infect Dis Clin N Amer. 2007;21:773‐784. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wallace GT, Weishaar MG, Henry KL. Applying a health‐risk behavior lens to understand individual differences in COVID‐19 containment behavior among young adults. Emerg Adulthood. 10(1):304‐310. doi:10.1177/21676968211044553 - DOI
    1. Hutchins HJ, Wolff B, Leeb R, et al. COVID‐19 mitigation behaviors by age group ‐ United States, April‐June 2020. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020;69(43):1584‐1590. doi:10.15585/mmwr.mm6943e4 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rosenblum HG, Segaloff HE, Cole D, et al. Behaviors and attitudes of college students during an academic semester at two Wisconsin universities during the COVID‐19 pandemic. J Am Coll Health. 2022;1:1‐8. doi:10.1080/07448481.2022.2080504 - DOI - PMC - PubMed