Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Dec;51(6):1057-1064.
doi: 10.1111/cdoe.12861. Epub 2023 May 29.

Is there an acceptable surrogate for caries clinical trials? Evidence from a systematic review of primary studies

Thais Gimenez  1   2 , Luana Rodrigues Estevam  3 , Yohana de Oliveira Ponte  3 , Adriana Dalboni  2 , Ana Flávia Bissoto Calvo  3 , Tamara Kerber Tedesco  4 , Laura Regina Antunes Pontes  1 , Bruna Lorena Pereira Moro  1 , Daniela Prócida Raggio  1   5 , Mariana Minatel Braga  1 , Fausto Medeiros Mendes  1
Affiliations

Is there an acceptable surrogate for caries clinical trials? Evidence from a systematic review of primary studies

Thais Gimenez et al. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2023 Dec.

Abstract

Background: There is currently a lack of evidence supporting the use of valid surrogates in caries clinical trials. This study aimed at examining the validity of two surrogate outcomes used in randomized clinical trials for caries prevention, pit and fissure sealants and fluoridated dentifrices, according to the Prentice criteria.

Methods: A systematic review was conducted in MEDLINE (PubMed), LILACS and Scopus databases up to 05 October 2022. The grey literature and the list of eligible studies' references were also screened. The search was conducted, selecting randomized clinical trials focussed on dental caries prevention using pit and fissure sealants or fluoridated dentifrices and with at least one surrogate endpoint for cavitated caries lesions. The risk of each surrogate endpoint and for the occurrence of cavitated caries lesions was calculated and compared. The association between each surrogate and the presence of cavitation was quantified, and each outcome was assessed graphically for validity according to the Prentice criteria.

Results: For pit and fissure sealants, from 1696 potentially eligible studies, 51 were included; while for fluoridated dentifrices, of 3887 potentially eligible studies, four were included. Possible surrogates assessed were retention of sealants, presence of white spot lesions, presence of plaque or marginal discoloration around the sealants, oral hygiene index, radiographic and fluorescence caries lesion assessments. However, only the retention of sealants and the presence of white spot lesions could be evaluated for their validity according to the Prentice criteria.

Conclusion: Loss of retention of sealants and the presence of white spot lesions do not fulfil all of the Prentice criteria. Therefore, they cannot be considered valid surrogates for caries prevention.

Keywords: Biomarkers; dental caries; health care; outcome assessment.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Oral Disorders Collaborators GBD, Bernabe E, Marcenes W, et al. Global, regional, and National Levels and trends in burden of Oral conditions from 1990 to 2017: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease 2017 study. J Dent Res. 2020;99(4):362-373.
    1. Mendes FM, Braga MM, Passaro AL, et al. How researchers should select the best outcomes for randomised clinical trials in paediatric dentistry? Int J Paediatr Dent. 2020;31:23-30.
    1. Ferreira Zandona A, Santiago E, Eckert GJ, et al. The natural history of dental caries lesions: a 4-year observational study. J Dent Res. 2012;91(9):841-846.
    1. Wang Y, Taylor JMG. A measure of the proportion of treatment effect explained by a surrogate marker. Biometrics. 2002;58(4):803-812.
    1. Prentice RL. Surrogate endpoints in clinical trials: definition and operational criteria. Stat Med. 1989;8(4):431-440.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources