A new formula for estimating gestational age by crown-rump length
- PMID: 37247668
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2023.101035
A new formula for estimating gestational age by crown-rump length
Erratum in
-
Corrigendum to A new formula for estimating gestational age by crown-rump length. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology MFM. Volume 5, Issue 10, October 2023, 101035.Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2024 Feb;6(2):101254. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2023.101254. Epub 2023 Dec 30. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2024. PMID: 38161145 No abstract available.
Abstract
Background: The accurate estimation of gestational age by ultrasound is crucial in prenatal care for the monitoring of fetal growth and development. As changes in maternal childbearing age, body habitus, and ultrasound technology occur, previously published formulas may not be accurate for today's population.
Objective: This study aimed to develop new formulas for calculating the gestational age based on a first-trimester ultrasound scan and to compare the new formulas with preexisting formulas.
Study design: This study was a single-center, retrospective observational study that included pregnancies conceived using in vitro fertilization. The pregnancies had known dates of embryo transfer and multiple standard ultrasound examinations in the first trimester of pregnancy. Pregnancies ending with a miscarriage or termination in the first trimester of pregnancy were excluded. A polynomial regression analysis was performed to determine the optimal model that represented the relationship between gestational age and crown-rump length. The models were evaluated using systematic error, random error, absolute difference of the calculated gestational age and actual gestational age, and proportion of estimation within 0 and 2 days of the known gestational age. The optimal model was chosen and compared with preexisting formulas.
Results: Overall, 1436 ultrasound results were included in the analysis. The analysis produced 3 models: linear, cubic, and quadratic models with correlation coefficients of 0.968, 0.989, and 0.991, respectively. The cubic formula was superior to the linear and quadratic formulas concerning systematic error, random error, absolute difference, and proportion of estimation within 0 and 2 days. The new formula had a lower systematic error, random error, and mean absolute difference (0.06%, 2.43%, and 0.97 days, respectively) and the highest proportion of estimation within 0 and 2 days (37.4% and 93.5%, respectively) than previously published formulas.
Conclusion: The formula proposed in this study followed a cubic model and seemed to be able to more accurately estimate gestational age in the first trimester of pregnancy based on crown-rump length compared with previously published formulas.
Keywords: Crown-rump length; early pregnancy; gestational age; ultrasound.
Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Gestational age reference from crown-rump length during 11-14 weeks: a population-based multicenter cohort study in China.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025 Feb 26;25(1):214. doi: 10.1186/s12884-025-07295-8. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025. PMID: 40011832 Free PMC article.
-
Fetal crown-rump length and estimation of gestational age in an ethnic Chinese population.Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Feb;33(2):157-60. doi: 10.1002/uog.6252. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009. PMID: 19115262
-
Biparietal diameter for first-trimester pregnancy dating: multicenter cohort study.Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2025 May;65(5):560-566. doi: 10.1002/uog.29216. Epub 2025 Apr 3. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2025. PMID: 40179227
-
Early prognostic factors of outcomes in monochorionic twin pregnancy: systematic review and meta-analysis.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Nov;219(5):436-446. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.05.008. Epub 2018 May 12. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018. PMID: 29763608
-
Should a first trimester dating scan be routine for all pregnancies?Semin Perinatol. 2013 Oct;37(5):307-9. doi: 10.1053/j.semperi.2013.06.006. Semin Perinatol. 2013. PMID: 24176152 Review.
Cited by
-
Novel sonographic reference charts for early pregnancy based on known gestational age.F S Rep. 2024 Dec 4;6(1):52-59. doi: 10.1016/j.xfre.2024.11.008. eCollection 2025 Mar. F S Rep. 2024. PMID: 40201088 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials