Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Aug;51(8):1665-1682.
doi: 10.1007/s10439-023-03242-w. Epub 2023 May 29.

A Systematic Review on Lower-Limb Industrial Exoskeletons: Evaluation Methods, Evidence, and Future Directions

Affiliations

A Systematic Review on Lower-Limb Industrial Exoskeletons: Evaluation Methods, Evidence, and Future Directions

Pranav Madhav Kuber et al. Ann Biomed Eng. 2023 Aug.

Abstract

Industrial tasks that involve frequent sitting/standing transitions and squatting activities can benefit from lower-limb industrial exoskeletons; however, their use is not as widespread as their upper-body counterparts. In this review, we examined 23 articles that evaluated the effects of using Wearable Chair (WC) and Squat-assist (SA) exoskeletons. Evaluations mainly included assessment of muscular demands in the thigh, shank, and upper/lower back regions. Both types of devices were found to lessen muscular demands in the lower body by 30-90%. WCs also reduced low-back demands (~ 37%) and plantar pressure (54-80%) but caused discomfort/unsafe feeling in participants. To generalize outcomes, we suggest standardizing approaches used for evaluating the devices. Along with addressing low adoption through design upgrades (e.g., ground and body supports/attachments), we recommend that researchers thoroughly evaluate temporal effects on muscle fatigue, metabolic rate, and stability of wearers. Although lower-limb exoskeletons were found to be beneficial, discrepancies in experimental protocols (posture/task/measures) were discovered. We also suggest simulating more realistic conditions, such as walking/sitting interchangeability for WCs and lifting loads for SA devices. The presented outcomes could help improve the design/evaluation approaches, and implementation of lower limb wearable devices across industries.

Keywords: Assessment; Assistive Devices; Biomechanics; Ergonomics; Lower Body; Physical Demand; Squatting; Technology Acceptance; Wearable Chair; Workplace Injury.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Alemi, M. M. Biomechanical assessment and metabolic evaluation of passive lift-assistive exoskeletons during repetitive lifting tasks. Diss. Virginia Tech. 5:1–144, 2019.
    1. Alemi, M. M., J. Geissinger, A. A. Simon, S. E. Chang, and A. T. Asbeck. A passive exoskeleton reduces peak and mean EMG during symmetric and asymmetric lifting. J. Electromyogr. Kinesiol. 47:25–34, 2019. - PubMed - DOI
    1. Alemi, M. M., S. Madinei, S. Kim, D. Srinivasan, and M. A. Nussbaum. Effects of two passive back-support exoskeletons on muscle activity, energy expenditure, and subjective assessments during repetitive lifting. Hum. Factors. 62:458–474, 2020. - PubMed - DOI
    1. Ali, A., V. Fontanari, W. Schmoelz, and S. K. Agrawal. Systematic review of back-support exoskeletons and soft robotic suits. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 9:1–15, 2021. - DOI
    1. Antle, D. M., N. Vézina, K. Messing, and J. N. Côté. Development of discomfort and vascular and muscular changes during a prolonged standing task. Occup. Ergon. 11:21–33, 2013. - DOI

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources