Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 May 29;21(1):51.
doi: 10.1186/s12955-023-02132-y.

Agitation and aggression in people living with dementia and mild cognitive impairment in shared-housing arrangements - validation of a German version of the Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory-Short Form (CMAI-SF)

André Kratzer  1 , Jennifer Scheel-Barteit  2 , Janissa Altona  3 , Karin Wolf-Ostermann  3   4 , Elmar Graessel  5 , Carolin Donath  5
Affiliations

Agitation and aggression in people living with dementia and mild cognitive impairment in shared-housing arrangements - validation of a German version of the Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory-Short Form (CMAI-SF)

André Kratzer et al. Health Qual Life Outcomes. .

Abstract

Background: The Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory-Short Form (CMAI-SF) is a 14-item scale for assessing agitation and aggression, derived from the original 29-item CMAI, and completed by a proxy. Because the CMAI-SF has not yet been validated in German language, the aim of this study is to explore its construct validity.

Methods: Baseline data from a cluster-randomized trial to evaluate a non-pharmacological complex intervention for people living with dementia (PlwD) and mild cognitive impairment (MCI) were analyzed. The study sample consisted of 97 shared-housing arrangements (SHAs) in Germany, comprising N = 341 residents with mild to severe dementia and MCI. Trained nursing staff collected data by proxy-rating the CMAI-SF, Neuropsychiatric Inventory-Nursing Home Version (NPI-NH), and QUALIDEM. They also conducted the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA).

Results: In an exploratory factor analysis, three factors emerged: "aggressive behavior", "verbally agitated behavior", and "physically non-aggressive behavior". The CMAI-SF total score showed good internal consistency (α = .85), and the factors themselves showed adequate internal consistency (α = .75/.76/.73). The CMAI-SF showed convergent validity with the NPI-NH agitation item (r = .66) and the NPI-NH "agitation & restless behavior" factor (r = .82). Discriminant validity was confirmed by a low (r = .28) correlation with the NPI-NH apathy item. Quality of life decreased significantly with agitation, as the CMAI-SF showed a moderate negative correlation with the QUALIDEM total score (r = -.35).

Conclusions: The 14-item CMAI-SF is a time-efficient, reliable, and valid assessment instrument. Three factors emerged that were similar to those already found in nursing home samples for the original CMAI and the CMAI-SF and in day care samples for the CMAI-SF. The findings provide preliminary evidence that the CMAI-SF can be used instead of the CMAI to reduce time, costs, and burden in future trials.

Trial registration: The DemWG study from which data were used to draft this manuscript was prospectively registered on 16 July 2019 at ISRCTN registry (ISRCTN89825211).

Keywords: Aggression; Agitation; CMAI; CMAI-SF; Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory; Dementia; Mild cognitive impairment; Reliability; Shared-housing arrangements; Validity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Distribution of the CMAI-SF total score. Illustration of the absolute number of participants (y-axis) with the respective CMAI-SF score (x-axis). Higher scores indicate more pronounced agitation and aggression, range: 14–70
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Scree plot for the principal component analysis (PCA) of the CMAI-SF total score
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Kales HC, Gitlin LN, Lyketsos CG. Assessment and management of behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia. BMJ. 2015;350:h369. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h369. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Livingston G, Barber J, Marston L, Rapaport P, Livingston D, Cousins S, Robertson S, La Frenais F, Cooper C. Prevalence of and associations with agitation in residents with dementia living in care homes: MARQUE cross-sectional study. BJPsych Open.10.1192/bjpo.bp.117.0051812017;3:171–8. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zuidema SU, Derksen E, Verhey FRJ, Koopmans RTCM. Prevalence of neuropsychiatric symptoms in a large sample of Dutch nursing home patients with dementia. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2007;22:632–638. doi: 10.1002/gps.1722. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cloak N, Al Khalili Y. Behavioral And Psychological Symptoms In Dementia. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2021. - PubMed
    1. Baharudin AD, Din NC, Subramaniam P, Razali R. The associations between behavioral-psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD) and coping strategy, burden of care and personality style among low-income caregivers of patients with dementia. BMC Public Health. 2019;19:447. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-6868-0. - DOI - PMC - PubMed