Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 May 24;5(1):vdad039.
doi: 10.1093/noajnl/vdad039. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.

Current landscape of social media use pertaining to glioblastoma by various stakeholders

Mohammed Ali Alvi  1 , Lior M Elkaim  2 , Jordan J Levett  3 , Alejandro Pando  4 , Sabrina Roy  5 , Nardin Samuel  1 , Naif M Alotaibi  6 , Gelareh Zadeh  7
Affiliations
Review

Current landscape of social media use pertaining to glioblastoma by various stakeholders

Mohammed Ali Alvi et al. Neurooncol Adv. .

Abstract

Background: Given the potential for social media to allow widespread public engagement, its role in healthcare, including in cancer care as a support network, is garnering interest. To date, the use of social media in neuro-oncology has not been systematically explored. In the current manuscript, we sought to review Twitter use on glioblastoma among patients, caregivers, providers, researchers, and other stakeholders.

Methods: The Twitter application programming interface (API) database was surveyed from inception to May 2022 to identify tweets about glioblastoma. Number of tweet likes, retweets, quotes, and total engagement were noted for each tweet. Geographic location, number of followers, and number of Tweets were noted for users. We also categorized Tweets based on their underlying themes. A natural language processing (NLP) algorithm was used to assign a polarity score, subjectivity score, and analysis label to each Tweet for sentiment analysis.

Results: A total of 1690 unique tweets from 1000 accounts were included in our analyses. The frequency of tweets increased from 2013 and peaked in 2018. The most common category among users was MD/researchers (21.6%, n = 216), followed by Media/News (20%, n = 200) and Business (10.7%); patients or caregivers accounted for only 4.7% (n = 47) while medical centers, journals, and foundations accounted for 5.4%, 3.7%, and 2.1%. The most common subjects that Tweets covered included research (54%), followed by personal experience (18.2%) and raising awareness (14%). In terms of sentiment, 43.6% of Tweets were classified as positive, 41.6% as neutral, and 14.9% as negative; a subset analysis of "personal experience" tweets revealed a higher proportion of negative Tweets (31.5%) and less neutral tweets (25%). Only media (β = 8.4; 95% CI [4.4, 12.4]) and follower count (minimally) predicted higher levels of Tweet engagement.

Conclusion: This comprehensive analysis of tweets on glioblastoma found that the academic community are the most common user group on Twitter. Sentiment analysis revealed that most negative tweets are related to personal experience. These analyses provide the basis for further work into supporting and developing the care of patients with glioblastoma.

Keywords: GBM; glioblastoma; social media; twitter.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest relevant to this article to disclose.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Flowchart detailing the inclusion of Tweets analyzed in the current manuscript.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Figure demonstrating the number of Tweets per calendar year from the random sample of 1690 included tweets.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Aldoghachi AF, Aldoghachi AF, Breyne K, Ling KH, Cheah PS.. Recent advances in the therapeutic strategies of glioblastoma multiforme. Neuroscience. 2022;491:240–270. - PubMed
    1. Pitz MW, Desai A, Grossman SA, Blakeley JO.. Tissue concentration of systemically administered antineoplastic agents in human brain tumors. J Neurooncol. 2011;104(3):629–638. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Alotaibi NM, Badhiwala JH, Nassiri F, et al. . The current use of social media in neurosurgery. World Neurosurg. 2016;88:619–624.e7. - PubMed
    1. Smailhodzic E, Hooijsma W, Boonstra A, Langley DJ.. Social media use in healthcare: a systematic review of effects on patients and on their relationship with healthcare professionals. BMC Health Serv Res. 206;16(1):1–14. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Yakar F, Jacobs R, Agarwal N.. The current usage of Instagram in neurosurgery. Interdiscip Neurosurg. 2020;19:100553.

LinkOut - more resources