Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 May 23;11(5):23259671231168885.
doi: 10.1177/23259671231168885. eCollection 2023 May.

The "N+10 Rule" to Avoid Graft-Tunnel Mismatch in Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone ACL Reconstruction Using Independent Femoral Tunnel Drilling

Affiliations

The "N+10 Rule" to Avoid Graft-Tunnel Mismatch in Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone ACL Reconstruction Using Independent Femoral Tunnel Drilling

Ryan M Graf et al. Orthop J Sports Med. .

Abstract

Background: Graft-tunnel mismatch (GTM) is a common problem in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR) using bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) grafts.

Hypothesis: Application of the "N+10 rule" in endoscopic ACLR with BPTB grafts will result in acceptable tibial tunnel length (TTL), minimizing GTM.

Study design: Controlled laboratory study.

Methods: Endoscopic BPTB ACLR was conducted on the paired knees of 10 cadaveric specimens using 2 independent femoral tunnel drilling techniques-accessory anteromedial portal and flexible reamer. The graft bone blocks were trimmed to 10 × 20 mm, and the intertendinous distance (represented by "N") between the bone blocks was measured. The N+10 rule was used to set the angle of the ACL tibial tunnel guide to the appropriate number of degrees for drilling. The amount of excursion or recession of the tibial bone plug in relation to the anterior tibial cortical aperture was measured in both flexion and extension. A GTM threshold of ±7.5 mm was set based on prior studies.

Results: The mean BPTB ACL intertendinous distance was 47.5 ± 5.5 mm. The mean measured intra-articular distance was 27.2 ± 3 mm. Using the N+10 rule, the mean total (flexion plus extension) GTM was 4.3 ± 3.2 mm (GTM in flexion, 4.9 ± 3.6 mm; GTM in extension, 3.8 ± 3.5 mm). In 18 of 20 (90%) cadaveric knees, the mean total GTM fell within the ±7.5-mm threshold. When comparing the actual measured TTL to the calculated TTL, there was a mean difference of 5.4 ± 3.9 mm. When comparing femoral tunnel drilling techniques, the total GTM for the accessory anteromedial portal technique was 2.1 ± 3.7 mm, while the total GTM for the flexible reamer technique was 3.6 ± 5.4 mm (P = .5).

Conclusion: The N+10 rule resulted in an acceptable mean GTM in both flexion and extension. The mean difference between the measured versus calculated TTL using the N+10 rule was also acceptable.

Clinical relevance: The N+10 rule is a simple and effective intraoperative strategy for achieving desired TTL regardless of patient-specific factors to avoid excessive GTM in endoscopic BPTB ACLR using independent femoral tunnel drilling.

Keywords: anterior cruciate ligament; graft-tunnel mismatch; reconstruction; tibial tunnel length.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

One or more of the authors has declared the following potential conflict of interest or source of funding: S.E.D. has received education payments from Arthrex and hospitality payments from Stryker. I.S.M. has received education payments from Medwest. T.E.M. has received education payments from Fortis Surgical. B.C.W. has received education payments, consulting fees, and nonconsulting fees from Arthrex and hospitality payments from Integra LifeSciences. F.W.G. has received education payments from Fortis Surgical; consulting fees from DePuy/Medical Device Business Services and OsteoCentric Technologies; nonconsulting fees from Arthrex; royalties from OsteoCentric Technologies and Smith & Nephew; and hospitality payments from Stryker. M.D.M. has received consulting fees from Arthrex and Ipsen Bioscience; nonconsulting fees and royalties from Arthrex; and honoraria from Encore Medical. AOSSM checks author disclosures against the Open Payments Database (OPD). AOSSM has not conducted an independent investigation on the OPD and disclaims any liability or responsibility relating thereto.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
An intraoperative photo of a bone–patellar tendon–bone anterior cruciate ligament autograft showing the intertendinous distance (“N”; 55 mm) between the bone plugs.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
An intraoperative photo of the tibial ACL guide (Arthrex) being set using the N+10 rule. Given the intertendinous distance of 55 mm (as measured in Figure 1), the guide angle for drilling was set to 65°. The inset shows that the approximate drilled tunnel length was 50 mm.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
An intraoperative photo of the ACL tibial tunnel guide (Arthrex) positioned on the anatomic tibial footprint. The guide is set to 65° (“N” = 55 mm, as shown in Figure 1). Using this angle for the guide, the TTL is estimated to be 50 mm (inset). Notice how the guide is positioned parallel to the tibial articular surface for accurate distances. ACL, anterior cruciate ligament; TTL, tibial tunnel length.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
A derived formula for calculating the predicted TTL using the IAD and the known measured value of the intertendinous distance (N) and the set lengths of the bone blocks (20 mm). IAD, intra-articular distance; TTL, tibial tunnel length.

References

    1. Arnold MP, Calcei JG, Vogel N, et al.. ACL Study Group survey reveals the evolution of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction graft choice over the past three decades. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2021;29(11):3871-3876. - PubMed
    1. Black KP, Saunders MM, Stube KC, Moulton MJ, Jacobs CR. Effects of interference fit screw length on tibial tunnel fixation for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2000;28(6):846-849. - PubMed
    1. Brand J, Weiler A, Caborn DN, Brown CH, Johnson DL. Graft fixation in cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2000;28(5):761-774. - PubMed
    1. Brown JA, Brophy RH, Franco J, et al.. Avoiding allograft length mismatch during anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: patient height as an indicator of appropriate graft length. Am J Sports Med. 2007;35(6):986-989. - PubMed
    1. Busam ML, Provencher MT, Bach BR. Complications of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with bone-patellar tendon-bone constructs: care and prevention. Am J Sports Med. 2008;36(2):379-394. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources