Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023;126(11-12):5307-5323.
doi: 10.1007/s00170-023-11486-y. Epub 2023 May 1.

FDM technology and the effect of printing parameters on the tensile strength of ABS parts

Affiliations

FDM technology and the effect of printing parameters on the tensile strength of ABS parts

Mohamed Daly et al. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2023.

Abstract

The effect of printing speed on the tensile strength of acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) samples fabricated using the fused deposition modelling (FDM) process is addressed in this research. The mechanical performance of FDM-ABS products was evaluated using four different printing speeds (10, 30, 50, and 70 mm/s). A numerical model was developed to simulate the experimental campaign by coupling two computational codes, Abaqus and Digimat. In addition, this article attempts to investigate the impacts of printing parameters on ASTM D638 ABS specimens. A 3D thermomechanical model was implemented to simulate the printing process and evaluate the printed part quality by analysing residual stress, temperature gradient and warpage. Several parts printed in Digimat were analysed and compared numerically. The parametric study allowed us to quantify the effect of 3D printing parameters such as printing speed, printing direction, and the chosen discretisation (layer by layer or filament) on residual stresses, deflection, warpage, and resulting mechanical behaviour.

Keywords: ABS material; Abaqus/Digimat coupling; Fused deposition modelling; Printing speed.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interestThe authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Geometry and dimensions of the tensile specimens [24]
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Characterisation of the mechanical properties of FDM-ABS specimens: (a) Printed tensile specimen and (b) tensile testing configuration [24]
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Representative true stress. True strain curves for the manufactured tensile specimens with different printing speeds
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Kinetics of a coupled Abaqus/Digimat computation
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Coupling procedure between Abaqus and Digimat
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Mapped manufacturing data visualised on the structural model, filament orientation (eigenvector)
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
Specimen mesh C3D8R
Fig. 8
Fig. 8
Stress-strain curve for a printing speed of 10 mm/s
Fig. 9
Fig. 9
Work sequences in Digimat-AM
Fig. 10
Fig. 10
Superposition of the mesh between Abaqus and Digimat
Fig. 11
Fig. 11
Stress-strain curves for a printing speed of 10 mm/s
Fig. 12
Fig. 12
Stress-strain curve determined numerically for 4 printing speeds
Fig. 13
Fig. 13
Residual stresses at the end of the manufacturing process
Fig. 14
Fig. 14
Deflection at the end of the manufacturing
Fig. 15
Fig. 15
Technique for scanning many layers of an ASTM-D638 part (type IV)
Fig. 16
Fig. 16
A few frames for 3D printing of polymer composites using layer deposit FDM process: variation of the temperature
Fig. 17
Fig. 17
Profile of temperature and Von Mises stress utilising the layer deposit technique at various points of the ABS thickness
Fig. 18
Fig. 18
Layer-by-layer vs filament discretisation
Fig. 19
Fig. 19
Comparison of the temperature profile for two printing techniques
Fig. 20
Fig. 20
Variation of the stress concentration and the temperature for two processes
Fig. 21
Fig. 21
Printing direction
Fig. 22
Fig. 22
Curves determined numerically for printing direction 45/−45, 0/90, 60/−60
Fig. 23
Fig. 23
Warping of ABS specimen
Fig. 24
Fig. 24
Printing cost for an ABS specimen

References

    1. Kumar R, Kumar M, Chohan JS. The role of additive manufacturing for biomedical applications: a critical review. J Manuf Process. 2021;64:828–850. doi: 10.1016/j.jmapro.2021.02.022. - DOI
    1. Algzlan H, Varada S. Three-dimensional printing of the skin. JAMA Dermatol. 2015;151(2):207–207. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2014.1198. - DOI - PubMed
    1. El Moumen A, Tarfaoui M, Lafdi K. Additive manufacturing of polymer composites: processing and modeling approaches. Compos Part B Eng. 2019;171:166–182. doi: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.04.029. - DOI
    1. Ko J, et al. Effect of build angle and layer height on the accuracy of 3-dimensional printed dental models. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2021;160(3):451–458. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2020.11.039. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Tay YWD, et al. 3D printing trends in building and construction industry: a review. Virtual Phys Prototyp. 2017;12(3):261–276. doi: 10.1080/17452759.2017.1326724. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources