Learning Curve of Perclose ProGlide Utilization During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
- PMID: 37252468
- PMCID: PMC10217787
- DOI: 10.7759/cureus.38155
Learning Curve of Perclose ProGlide Utilization During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to investigate the learning curve (LC) of Perclose ProGlide (Chicago, IL: Abbott Laboratories) utilization for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for the first time.
Methods: The study was conducted in a prospective manner and the final sample of the study was determined as 80 patients. Patients' characteristics, diameter of common femoral artery (CFA), distance from skin to CFA, degree of calcification (<50% or ≥50%), procedure-related parameters, complications, and success of procedures were recorded. Patients were equally divided into four groups and groups were compared according to patient demographic properties, procedure-related parameters, complications, and success.
Results: The mean age and mean BMI of the study population were 55.5 years and 27.5 kg/m2, respectively. The mean procedure time was 144.8 minutes (min) in group 1, 138.9 min in group 2, 122.2 min in group 3, and 101.1 min in group 4, and the difference was statistically shorter in favor of group 3 and group 4 (p=0.023). Moreover, mean fluoroscopy time significantly decreased after 20 cases (p=0.030). Hospitalization period was significantly shortened following 40 procedures (p=0.031). Complications were detected in five patients in group 1, four patients in group 2, and one patient in group 4 (p=0.044). Success was significantly higher in group 3 and group 4 in comparison to group 1 and group 2 (p=0.040).
Conclusion: This study showed that procedure time and hospitalization time significantly decreased after 40 cases and fluoroscopy time significantly decreased after 20 cases. Moreover, after 40 procedures, the success of Perclose ProGlide utilization during PCI significantly increased and complications of the procedure significantly decreased.
Keywords: complication; coronary intervention; learning curve; perclose proglide™; success.
Copyright © 2023, Varis et al.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
References
-
- Recent advances in percutaneous coronary intervention. Hoole SP, Bambrough P. Heart. 2020;106:1380–1386. - PubMed
-
- Correlates and outcomes of retroperitoneal hemorrhage complicating percutaneous coronary intervention. Ellis SG, Bhatt D, Kapadia S, Lee D, Yen M, Whitlow PL. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2006;67:541–545. - PubMed
-
- A propensity analysis of the risk of vascular complications after cardiac catheterization procedures with the use of vascular closure devices. Arora N, Matheny ME, Sepke C, Resnic FS. Am Heart J. 2007;153:606–611. - PubMed
-
- Perclose ProGlide™ for vascular closure. Del Prete A, Della Rocca DG, Calcagno S, et al. Future Cardiol. 2021;17:269–282. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous