Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 May 30;14(1):2990.
doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-38375-y.

An updated floristic map of the world

Affiliations

An updated floristic map of the world

Yunpeng Liu et al. Nat Commun. .

Abstract

Floristic regions reflect the geographic organization of floras and provide essential tools for biological studies. Previous global floristic regions are generally based on floristic endemism, lacking a phylogenetic consideration that captures floristic evolution. Moreover, the contribution of tectonic dynamics and historical and current climate to the division of floristic regions remains unknown. Here, by integrating global distributions and a phylogeny of 12,664 angiosperm genera, we update global floristic regions and explore their temporal changes. Eight floristic realms and 16 nested sub-realms are identified. The previously-defined Holarctic, Neotropical and Australian realms are recognized, but Paleotropical, Antarctic and Cape realms are not. Most realms have formed since Paleogene. Geographic isolation induced by plate tectonics dominates the formation of floristic realms, while current/historical climate has little contribution. Our study demonstrates the necessity of integrating distributions and phylogenies in regionalizing floristic realms and the interplay of macroevolutionary and paleogeographic processes in shaping regional floras.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Floristic realms and sub-realms of the world.
a Boundaries of the eight floristic realms and 16 sub-realms are shown in solid and dashed lines, respectively. b The unrooted dendrogram depicts the relationships among floristic realms evaluated using UPGMA clustering method based on phylogenetic beta diversity between realms. The scale bar in the dendrogram shows the dissimilarity between realms. c The scatter plot shows the dissimilarities in the phylogenetic compositions between different geographic standard units (GSU) generated using non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) ordination. Each tip in the dendrogram and each point in the scatter plot represents a geographic standard unit and the colors indicate the floristic realms that they belong to. For comparison, the floristic realms and sub-realms based on trees with alternative dating constraints are shown in Supplementary Fig. 2. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. Chronology of the present-day floristic realms.
The phylogenetic tree is cut at successive phylogenetic depths and all descendent leaves are collapsed into the branches encountered at that depth. Then the realms at each phylogenetic depth are identified using the same clustering method as in Fig. 1. It is noteworthy that we do not intend to estimate the ancestral geographic ranges of phylogenetic branches. This chronological sequence of maps represents the divergence times of flora that survived to the present day, but it provides only limited information on the ancestral floristic relatedness, which should be evaluated by fossils. The floristic realms which can be matched to the present-day realms are shown in the same colors as shown in Fig. 1a. As the present-day floristic realms are not distinguishable in some historical periods, we used other colors to represent these ancestral floristic realms. Specifically, light green in maps of 10, 40, and 50 Ma represents the ancestral realm covering the geographic ranges of the present-day African and Indo-Malesian realms; pink appearing from 100 Ma to 140 Ma represents the ancestral realms covering the present-day Neotropical+African realms, the present-day Neotropical+African+Indo-Malesian realms, and the present-day Gondwanan super-realm, respectively. Notably, most present-day floristic realms are undistinguishable in 160 Ma.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3. The sequential appearance of the present floristic dissimilarities between different realms evaluated using non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) ordination.
The Euclidean distance between dots is positively associated with the dissimilarity in phylogenetic composition of the flora between them: the larger the distance, the higher is the dissimilarity. Each line represents the distance of present phylogenetic composition of a realm to other realms at different phylogenetic depths. The colors of the lines are consistent with the colors of the realms shown in Fig. 1a, and the color gradient of each thick line represents evolutionary time. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4. Effects of contemporary climate on the phylogenetic beta diversity within and between floristic realms (or clusters of realms).
The bars show the explained variance in the phylogenetic beta diversity within (red and blue) and between (gray) different realms (or clusters of realms) as shown by the inset maps. a Gondwanan super-realm vs. Laurasian super-realm; b Holarctic realm vs. Saharo-Arabian realm; c (Australian, Novozealandic) realms vs. ((African, Indo-Malesian), (Neotropical, Chile-Patagonian)) realms; d Neotropical realm vs. Chile-Patagonian realm; e (African, Indo-Malesian) realms vs. (Neotropical, Chile-Patagonian) realms; f Australian realm vs. Novozealandic realm and g African realm vs. Indo-Malesian realm. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5. Temporal changes in the relative effects of geographic isolation and historical climate on the phylogenetic beta diversity between floristic realms (or clusters of realms).
At each time interval of 1 Ma during the last 80 Ma, the partial R2 of geographic isolation and historical climate are evaluated using hierarchical partitioning model as ln (phylogenetic beta diversity) ~ ln (Climate isolation) + ln (Geographic isolation). Colors of lines represent the independent R2 of geographic isolation (green) and historical climate (blue) on phylogenetic beta diversity, respectively. The lines and the shaded areas represent the mean ± SE of the R2 summarized every 5 Ma. a Gondwanan super-realm vs. Laurasian super-realm; b Holarctic realm vs. Saharo-Arabian realm; c (Australian, Novozealandic) realms vs. ((African, Indo-Malesian), (Neotropical, Chile-Patagonian)) realms; d Neotropical realm vs. Chile-Patagonian realm; e (African, Indo-Malesian) realms vs. (Neotropical, Chile-Patagonian) realms; f Australian realm vs. Novozealandic realm and g African realm vs. Indo-Malesian realm. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

References

    1. Cox B. The biogeographic regions reconsidered. J. Biogeogr. 2001;28:511–523. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2699.2001.00566.x. - DOI
    1. Holt BG, et al. An update of Wallace’s Zoogeographic regions of the world. Science. 2013;339:74–78. doi: 10.1126/science.1228282. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Briggs JC. Darwin’s biogeography. J. Biogeogr. 2009;36:1011–1017. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2699.2008.02076.x. - DOI
    1. Takhtajan, A., Crovello, T. J. & Cronquist, A. Floristic Regions of The World. 544 (University of California Press, 1986).
    1. Desmond, A., Moore, J. & Browne, J. Charles Darwin (Oxford University Press, 2007).

Publication types