Significant increased bacterial contamination with endoscope overnight and weekend storage times
- PMID: 37254616
- DOI: 10.1111/jgh.16224
Significant increased bacterial contamination with endoscope overnight and weekend storage times
Abstract
Background and aim: Forced-air drying (FAD) cabinets are recommended for storage of reprocessed endoscopes, but financial constraints prevent their universal application. The study aimed to determine bacterial contamination in flexible gastroscopes (FG) channels after storage, in a cabinet with filtered air and UV lights, but without FAD.
Methods: Eight FG in clinical use in an endoscopy service of a large Brazilian hospital were sampled: immediately "Time zero" (N = 50), 12 h "Time 1" (N = 25), and 60 h "Time 2" (N = 25) after reprocessing. Following a flush-brush-flush of channels, 40-mL sterile water and 3 cm of the brush were collected. Each sample was divided, filtered onto two 0.22-μm membranes, and incubated in media without or with disinfectant neutralizer. Automated method was used for identification and antibiotic resistance test of isolated bacteria.
Results: Bacterial contamination in times "1" and "2" was 5.9 and 16.1 times greater than that of "Time zero," respectively. Number of positive cultures in media with and without neutralizer was similar at times "1" and "2," while media with neutralizer produced more positive cultures at "Time zero." Most bacteria isolated at "Time 2" were Gram-negative rods (52.3%) and showed resistance to one or more antibiotics (65%).
Conclusion: Bacterial contamination was detected on reprocessed FG stored in non-FAD cabinets overnight (12 h) and increased with longer storage time (60 h). The contamination source is likely to be bacteria in biofilm which multiply in the absence of FAD. Evidence-based criteria should be available for storage time according to the cabinet available.
Keywords: Disinfection; Endoscopes, gastrointestinal; Equipment contamination, biofilms.
© 2023 Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Foundation and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.
References
-
- World Gastroenterology Organisation - WGO. Endoscope disinfection update: a guide to resource-sensitive reprocessing. Estados Unidos: World Gastroenterology Organisation, 2019. Available from: https://www.worldgastroenterology.org/UserFiles/file/guidelines/endoscop...
-
- Association of Perioperative Registered Nurses - AORN. Guidelines for Perioperative Practice, 2020th edn. Denver: AORN, Inc., 2020.
-
- World Health Organization - WHO. Decontamination and reprocessing of medical devices for health-care facilities. Switzerland: World Health Organization, 2016. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/250232/9789241549851-en...
-
- Alfa MJ, Singh H. Impact of wet storage and other factors on biofilm formation and contamination of patient-ready endoscopes: a narrative review. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2020; 91: 236-247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2019.08.043
-
- Perumpail RB, Marya NB, McGinty BL, Muthusamy VR. Endoscope reprocessing: comparison of drying effectiveness and microbial levels with an automated drying and storage cabinet with forced filtered air and a standard storage cabinet. Am. J. Infect. Control 2019; 47: 1083-1089. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2019.02.016
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical